Studying the Effect of Expectations on High-Frequency Electrical Stimulation-Induced Pain and Pinprick...

Negative expectations can increase pain, but can they promote the development of central sensitization? This study used an inert treatment and verbal suggestions to induce expectations of increased high-frequency electrical stimulation (HFS)-induced pain and assessed their effects on pain ratings during HFS and HFS-induced pinprick hypersensitivity. Fifty healthy volunteers were randomly allocated to either a control group (N = 25) or a nocebo group (N = 25). Participants in both groups received a patch containing water on the right forearm. The nocebo group was told that the patch contained capsaicin that sensitized their skin, while the control group was told that the patch contained water that had no effect on skin sensitivity. Before and after patch attachment, single electrical stimuli were delivered to the area of the patch to measure the perceived intensity to these stimuli. After patch removal and after the participant rated expected pain and fear for HFS, HFS was delivered to the same skin site, followed by the assessment of pinprick sensitivity. The nocebo group rated the perceived intensity for the single electrical stimulus after removal of the patch as more intense compared with the control group, indicating that our manipulation worked. Yet, this effect did not transfer to expected pain for HFS, nor did it affect pain intensity ratings during HFS. HFS increased pinprick sensitivity but no group differences were found. Because of the lack of differences in expected pain and pain intensity ratings for HFS between groups, no firm conclusions can be drawn regarding their effect on pinprick hypersensitivity. PERSPECTIVE: This study shows that sham treatment combined with verbal suggestions induces a nocebo effect but does not necessarily change expectations and experience of upcoming pain.