Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Transcript and Metabolite Profiling for the Evaluation of Tobacco Tree and Poplar as Feedstock for the Bio-based Industry
Published on: May 16, 2014
Comparative life cycle assessment of PBAT from fossil-based and second-generation generation bio-based feedstocks
Chenkai Luo1, Ya Zhou1, Zhitong Chen1
1Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Ecological Security and Green Development, Key Laboratory for City Cluster Environmental Safety and Green Development of the Ministry of Education, School of Ecology, Environment and Resources, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Abstract:
With the increasing demand for plastics, plastic pollution is growing rapidly. A significant amount of plastic has leaked into the environment, leading to severe environmental issues. Biodegradable plastics are considered promising alternatives to conventional durable plastics, and the environmental impacts of biodegradable plastics have received increasing attention. Poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) is a commercial and cost-competitive biodegradable polymer and has been applied in the packaging and agriculture sectors. The environmental performances of PBAT with second-generation feedstocks from forestry waste have been rarely investigated. Since China is the leading global producer and exporter of PBAT polymer, Chinese cradle-to-gate life cycle inventories of PBAT were compiled in this study. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to explore the potential for environmental performance of PBAT with second-generation bio-based feedstock compared to fossil-based PBAT and conventional plastics. The results showed that feedstocks contributed to more than 70 % of 18 environmental impact categories of fossil-based PBAT. In comparison, PBAT with second-generation bio-based feedstock reduces the environmental loads in 16 impact categories by 15-85 %, and renewable energy substitution has the potential to reduce environmental impacts by 10 %. Bio-based PBAT performs better than PVC, PP, HDPE, LDPE, and PET in 16 impact categories by 15-80 %. Bio-based PBAT has GWP of 3.72 kg CO2 eq, which is 37 % lower than fossil-based PBAT (5.89 kg CO2 eq) and 18-32 % lower than conventional plastics. Since feedstock dominates the environmental performance of PBAT, the development of biomanufacturing technologies for bio-based polymers and chemicals could significantly improve environmental performance of biodegradable plastics and promote the sustainable development of the plastic industry. Results could serve as the basis for environmental impact and mitigation strategies for biodegradable plastics with bio-based feedstocks, as well as the sustainable development of the PBAT industry.
More Related Videos
05:05Quantification of Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate-based Micro- and Nano-plastics from Soil Using Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Published on: June 6, 2025
11:33Laboratory Production of Biofuels and Biochemicals from a Rapeseed Oil through Catalytic Cracking Conversion
Published on: September 2, 2016