Life-cycle water footprint analysis of Bama's biomass fuel in Guangxi combined with environment and economy assessment
- Chunxiang Chen 1, Haosen Shi 2, Xiankai Mo 2, Song Qiu 2
- Chunxiang Chen 1, Haosen Shi 2, Xiankai Mo 2
- 1College of Mechanical Engineering, Guangxi University, University Road 100, Xixiangtang District, Nanning City 530004, China; Guangxi Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Resources Processing and Process Intensification Technology, Nanning City 530004, China; Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Efficient and Clean Energy Utilization, Guangzhou City 510640, China.
- 2College of Mechanical Engineering, Guangxi University, University Road 100, Xixiangtang District, Nanning City 530004, China.
- 0College of Mechanical Engineering, Guangxi University, University Road 100, Xixiangtang District, Nanning City 530004, China; Guangxi Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Resources Processing and Process Intensification Technology, Nanning City 530004, China; Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Efficient and Clean Energy Utilization, Guangzhou City 510640, China.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Cassava and sugarcane straw are optimal biomass feedstocks for bio-ethanol, offering the lowest life-cycle water footprint. Hemp straw presents the highest water footprint and water pressure, indicating less sustainable bio-fuel production.
Area Of Science
- Agricultural Science
- Environmental Science
- Bioenergy
Background
- Biomass fuel production significantly impacts water resources.
- Assessing the life-cycle water footprint (WF) is crucial for sustainable bio-energy development.
- Understanding crop water usage and economic viability guides regional agricultural planning.
Purpose Of The Study
- To analyze the life-cycle water footprint (WF) of five crops (hemp, corn, soybean, sugarcane, cassava) for bio-ethanol production in Bama.
- To evaluate the environmental and economic performance of different biomass feedstocks.
- To provide guidance for optimizing biomass fuel production and water resource management.
Main Methods
- Utilized the CROPWAT 8.0 model to calculate the life-cycle WF for bio-ethanol conversion.
- Integrated environmental and economic assessments for comparative analysis.
- Analyzed crop water consumption and economic output value per unit area.
Main Results
- Cassava and sugarcane straw exhibited the lowest life-cycle WF (93–1732 m³/t), identifying them as superior feedstocks.
- Hemp straw demonstrated the highest life-cycle WF (40066–52,895 m³/t) and water pressure (K=0.32).
- Sugarcane provided the highest economic output value per unit area, significantly outperforming corn, while corn had the highest annual water consumption.
Conclusions
- Cassava and sugarcane are recommended for bio-ethanol production in Bama due to their favorable water footprint and economic benefits.
- Hemp cultivation for bio-ethanol is not recommended due to its substantial water footprint and associated water stress.
- Findings support informed decision-making for sustainable agriculture and water resource management in the region.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

