Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026
The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited
Published on: February 16, 2022
Indications, Surgical Strategies And Hearing Outcomes of Revision Stapes Surgery for Otosclerosis: A Systematic
Michele Tomasoni1, Daniele Borsetto2, Pietro Canzi3
1Unit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Objective:
To summarize current knowledge on the indications, surgical strategies, and auditory outcomes of revision stapes surgery (RSS) for otosclerosis.
Data Sources:
The search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science online databases, including papers published since 2000.
Review Methods:
The study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. We considered original series describing RSS for otosclerosis, reporting postoperative hearing outcomes according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines for conductive hearing loss (CHL) for at least 30 consecutive cases. The quality of included studies was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Pooled proportion and odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis were conducted using random effect models.
Results:
Nineteen studies were included, for a total of 2602 patients (2735 ears) and 2359 postoperative hearing results. RSS was mostly performed for recurrent CHL with air-bone gap (ABG)>20 dB. Multiple concomitant causes were often present, with prosthesis placement defect and incus necrosis as the most common causes. The pooled proportion of postoperative ABG<10 dB and ABG<20 dB was 57.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.8%-61.4%) and 79% (95% CI: 76.0%-81.8%), respectively. Dead ears were 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7%-2.1%). Compared to primary surgery, RSS had a significantly lower rate of ABG<10 dB (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24%-0.54%; P < .001). Both revision incudostapedotomy with/without incus reconstruction and malleovestibulopexy are viable options with nonsignificant differences in ABG closure rates (P = .182).
Conclusion:
RSS is challenging and requires the surgeon to carefully evaluate all potential causes of previous failure and tailor the intervention according to intraoperative findings. In most cases, ABG closure within 20 dB can be achieved with a relatively low risk of dead ears.
