Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

5.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
5.9K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.3K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.3K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

123
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
123
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

84
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
84
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Family engagement in the management of breast cancer-related lymphedema: A qualitative study.

International journal of nursing studies·2026
Same author

Protocol for evaluating the effects of the intelligent multimodal symptom assessment and response system in patients with pemphigus vulgaris: a randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Moment of Truth: Why Aha! Experiences are Correct.

The Journal of creative behavior·2026
Same author

From Sensory Details to Verbal Codes: Visual Memory Reinstatement of Location and Color Features.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The white matter of Aha! moments.

BMC psychology·2026
Same author

Mapping content and dynamics in the stream of consciousness through latent brain state analysis.

iScience·2025
Same journal

Insight Problem Solving Ability Predicts Reduced Susceptibility to Fake News, Bullshit, and Overclaiming.

Thinking & reasoning·2023
Same journal

Semantic Memory and Creativity: The Costs and Benefits of Semantic Memory Structure in Generating Original Ideas.

Thinking & reasoning·2023
Same journal

Executive Function in Learning Mathematics by Comparison: Incorporating Everyday Classrooms into the Science of Learning.

Thinking & reasoning·2021
Same journal

Developmental grey matter changes in superior parietal cortex accompany improved transitive reasoning.

Thinking & reasoning·2019
Same journal

Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions.

Thinking & reasoning·2016
Same journal

Determining transformation distance in similarity: Considerations for assessing representational changes a priori.

Thinking & reasoning·2016
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K

Solving problems with an Aha! increases risk preference.

Yuhua Yu1, Carola Salvi2,3, Maxi Becker4

  • 1Department of Psychology, Northwestern University.

Thinking & Reasoning
|September 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Experiencing an "Aha!" moment, or insight, temporarily increases risk-taking behavior. This insight-driven decision-making suggests a carryover effect impacting choices after solving problems.

Keywords:
insightproblem-solvingrisk decision-makingrisk preference

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

649
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

649
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Neuroscience of Insight

Background:

  • Insightful problem-solving, marked by an
  • Aha!
  • moment, is linked to positive affect.
  • Positive affect is generally associated with increased risk-taking tendencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of experiencing an
  • Aha!
  • moment on subsequent decision-making.
  • To determine if insight influences risk preference in choices involving monetary payouts.

Main Methods:

  • Participants solved verbal puzzles and self-reported experiencing insight.
  • Following each puzzle, participants chose between a fixed monetary payout and a risky payout with uncertain outcomes.
  • A within-subjects design was employed to compare choices after insight versus non-insight solutions.

Main Results:

  • Participants were significantly more likely to select the risky payout after solving puzzles with insight compared to without insight.
  • This finding suggests a temporary elevation in risk preference immediately following an insightful experience.
  • Preliminary evidence indicates a carryover effect of insight on risk-taking behavior.

Conclusions:

  • Experiencing an
  • Aha!
  • moment can lead to a temporary increase in risk-taking.
  • The findings have implications for understanding everyday decision-making, particularly when choices follow moments of clarity or discovery.
  • Further research is warranted to explore the mechanisms and boundaries of this insight-induced risk preference.