Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy oSLO and Optical Coherence Tomography OCT
Published on: August 4, 2018
Monocular visual SLAM, visual odometry, and structure from motion methods applied to 3D reconstruction: A
Erick P Herrera-Granda1,2,3, Juan C Torres-Cantero2, Diego H Peluffo-Ordóñez3,4
1Department of Mathematics, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Ladrón de Guevara E11-235, Quito, 170525, Ecuador.
Monocular Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM), Visual Odometry (VO), and Structure from Motion (SFM) offer affordable 3D reconstruction using cameras. Classical-sparse-indirect and classical-dense-indirect methods have dominated monocular 3D reconstruction for nearly two decades.
Area of Science:
- Computer Vision
- Robotics
- 3D Reconstruction
Background:
- Monocular Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM), Visual Odometry (VO), and Structure from Motion (SFM) are key techniques for 3D reconstruction using monocular cameras.
- These visual-only methods are favored for their cost-effectiveness, portability, and widespread availability on handheld devices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive overview and taxonomy of monocular SLAM, VO, and SFM techniques for 3D reconstruction.
- To systematize existing methods, including classic and machine learning approaches, by detailing their algorithms and formulations.
Main Methods:
- An extended taxonomy was developed, encompassing classic, machine learning, direct, indirect, dense, and sparse methods.
- A detailed review of 42 methods (18 classic, 24 machine learning) was conducted, analyzing their algorithms and formulations.
- Algorithms were summarized based on specific criteria to aid in system selection and design.
Main Results:
- The study classified 42 monocular 3D reconstruction methods within an extended taxonomy.
- Key information for 18 classic and 24 machine learning methods was systematically presented.
- An analysis of temporal trends revealed the sustained popularity of classical-sparse-indirect and classical-dense-indirect approaches.
Conclusions:
- The research offers a structured understanding of monocular 3D reconstruction techniques.
- The findings provide valuable insights for researchers and developers in selecting or designing 3D reconstruction systems.
- Classical-sparse-indirect and classical-dense-indirect methods remain the most prevalent solutions in the field.
Related Concept Videos
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

