Cost Comparison of Prostatic Artery Embolization Between In-Hospital and Outpatient-Based Lab Settings

Purpose This study aimed to determine the costs associated with prostatic artery embolization (PAE) performed in hospital and outpatient-based lab (OBL) settings. Methods Procedures were performed in similarly equipped procedure suites located within a tertiary hospital or OBL. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) was utilized to calculate procedural costs incurred by the institution. Process maps were created describing personnel, space, equipment, and materials. The time duration of each procedural step was recorded independently by a nurse caring for the patient at the time of the procedure, and mean values were included in our model. Using institutional and publicly available financial data, costs, and capacity cost rates were determined. Results Thirty-seven PAE procedures met inclusion criteria with a mean patient age of 70.4 (+/- 6.7) years and a mean prostate gland size of 129.7 (+/-56.4) cc. Twenty-six procedures were performed within the hospital setting, and 11 procedures were performed within the OBL. Reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was not significantly different following hospital and OBL procedures (57.2% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.0796). Mean procedural time was not significantly different between the hospital and OBL settings (136.6 vs. 147.3 minutes, P = 0.1893). However, the duration between admission and discharge was significantly longer for procedures performed in a hospital (468.8 vs. 325.4 minutes, P <0.0001). Total costs for hospital-based procedures were marginally higher ($3,858.28 vs. $3,642.67). Conclusion Total PAE cost was similar between the hospital and OBL settings. However, longer periprocedural times for hospital-based procedures and differences in reimbursement may favor the performance of PAE in an OBL setting.