Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
Bridging a Gap in Coherence: The Coordination of Comprehension Processes When Viewing Visual Narratives
Maverick E Smith1,2, John P Hutson2,3, Mi'Kayla Newell3
1Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Understanding picture stories involves mapping information and segmenting events. Coherence gaps influence how these processes coordinate, impacting comprehension and explanation generation.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Visual Perception
- Narrative Comprehension
Background:
- Scene Perception and Event Comprehension Theory (SPECT) explains understanding picture stories through mapping and shifting processes.
- Mapping involves integrating information coherently, while shifting segments experiences into distinct event models.
- The interplay between generating bridging inferences (mapping) and event segmentation (shifting) is crucial for comprehension.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how viewers coordinate mapping and shifting processes when coherence gaps are manipulated.
- To test competing hypotheses: Computational Effort Hypothesis vs. Coherence Gap Resolution Hypothesis.
- To examine the relationship between event segmentation and explanation generation in the presence and absence of bridging actions.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments using wordless picture stories with and without Bridging Action pictures to create coherence gaps.
- Manipulating the presence or absence of Bridging Action pictures to influence coherence and inference generation.
- Analyzing the relationship between event segmentation and the production of explanations.
Main Results:
- Viewers were more likely to segment events and generate explanations when Bridging Action pictures were absent.
- A negative relationship between segmentation and explanations was observed when coherence gaps were present (Bridging Actions absent), supporting the Coherence Gap Resolution Hypothesis.
- An unexpected positive relationship between segmentation and explanations occurred when Bridging Actions were present.
Conclusions:
- Results support SPECT's premise that mapping and shifting processes are coordinated.
- The coordination between mapping and shifting is dynamically influenced by the experience of coherence gaps.
- The findings highlight the adaptive nature of comprehension strategies in response to narrative structure.
Related Concept Videos
Visual System
Once through the pupil, the light passes through the lens, a...
Vision
Parallel Processing
Gestalt Principles of Perception
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor...

