Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

1.5K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
1.5K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

5.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
5.9K
Subliminal Perception01:15

Subliminal Perception

246
Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...
246

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From Capture to Control: Initial Capture Increases Learned Suppression.

Psychological science·2026
Same author

Cue-driven attentional guidance nearly eliminates salience effects in working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Ignoring Salient Distractors Inside and Outside the Attentional Window.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Signal suppression 2.0: An updated account of attentional capture and suppression.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

Restoring a top-down control assumption: Salience effects in working memory are overcome with time.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Evidence against the low-salience account of attentional suppression.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

Salience effects on attentional selection are enabled by task relevance.

Yue Zhang1, Nicholas Gaspelin1

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|September 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Salience influences attention when relevant, but even highly salient, task-irrelevant stimuli can be suppressed to prevent distraction. This challenges purely stimulus-driven attention models.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.0K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.0K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Attention

Background:

  • Attention is a limited cognitive resource requiring control to avoid distraction.
  • Proactive suppression of salient stimuli is a known method to prevent attentional capture.
  • Previous studies on suppression effectiveness are debated due to difficulties in objectively measuring stimulus salience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce a novel technique to objectively measure stimulus salience.
  • Investigate the role of salience in attentional capture.
  • Test the predictions of the signal suppression hypothesis regarding task-irrelevant stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Generated low- and high-salience singletons using color contrast manipulation.
  • Experiment 1: Verified salience manipulation via a visual search task with task-relevant singletons.
  • Experiment 2: Assessed attentional capture using the same stimuli as task-irrelevant distractors.

Main Results:

  • High-salience singletons were identified faster than low-salience singletons when task-relevant.
  • Neither low- nor high-salience singletons captured attention when they were task-irrelevant distractors.
  • Both types of singletons were effectively suppressed in the distractor condition.

Conclusions:

  • Stimulus salience enhances attentional allocation primarily when the stimulus is task-relevant.
  • Findings support the signal suppression hypothesis, demonstrating that task-irrelevant salient stimuli can be actively suppressed.
  • Challenges purely bottom-up, stimulus-driven theories of attentional capture.