Evaluation of a Cytology-Molecular Co-Test in Liquid-Based Cytology-Processed Urine for Defining Indeterminate
Maria Samara1, Eleni Thodou1, Christina Apostolopoulou1
1Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Introduction:
Urine cytology using the Paris system (TPS) classification is useful for the detection and monitoring of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, the categories "atypical urothelial cells" (AUCs) and "suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" (SHGUC) do not establish a clear diagnosis. This pilot study aimed to investigate whether the presence of mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) genes, in urine processed with liquid-based cytology (LBC) could enhance the diagnostic performance of cytology, particularly in defining the indeterminate categories of AUC and SHGUC.
Methods:
Urine samples from 82 UC patients with primary tumors or under surveillance and 10 healthy individuals were examined. The ThinPrep method was used for cytology followed by DNA isolation from urine sediments. Targeted molecular analysis was achieved in 70 cases (63 patients and 7 controls) for exons 7 and 10 of the FGFR3 gene and the TERT gene promoter (pTERT), using PCR and Sanger sequencing. Molecular results were correlated with TPS cytology categories and validated by histopathological findings following cystoscopy.
Results:
In healthy subjects, cytology was negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC) and no mutations were found. No mutations were found in patients with NHGUC cytology, except for one case with equivocal cystoscopy that carried a pTERT mutation. In high-grade urothelial carcinoma cytology (HGUC) (15/20, 75%) of the cases with histologically confirmed UC, molecular analysis revealed the presence of pTERT without FGFR3 mutations. In SHGUC and AUC cytology, FGFR3 and/or pTERT mutations were detected in 3/4 (75%) and 4/4 (100%) histologically confirmed UC cases, respectively. Cytology sensitivity was 85.7% increasing to 100% with the combined cytology-molecular test, whereas specificity remained unchanged at 86.3%.
Conclusions:
This pilot study suggests that the incorporation of FGFR3/pTERT molecular testing in urine LBC could enhance the diagnostic value of cytology by diagnosing bladder urothelial carcinoma in indeterminate cytology categories.
