Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
Heterogeneous effects of Medicaid coverage on cardiovascular risk factors: secondary analysis of randomized
Kosuke Inoue1,2, Susan Athey3, Katherine Baicker4
1Department of Social Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan inoue.kosuke.2j@kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Objectives:
To investigate whether health insurance generated improvements in cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels) for identifiable subpopulations, and using machine learning to identify characteristics of people predicted to benefit highly.
Design:
Secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial.
Setting:
Medicaid insurance coverage in 2008 for adults on low incomes (defined as lower than the federal-defined poverty line) in Oregon who were uninsured.
Participants:
12 134 participants from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment with in-person data for health outcomes for both treatment and control groups.
Interventions:
Health insurance (Medicaid) coverage.
Main Outcomes Measures:
The conditional local average treatment effects of Medicaid coverage on systolic blood pressure and HbA1c using a machine learning causal forest algorithm (with instrumental variables). Characteristics of individuals with positive predicted benefits of Medicaid coverage based on the algorithm were compared with the characteristics of others. The effect of Medicaid coverage was calculated on blood pressure and HbA1c among individuals with high predicted benefits.
Results:
In the in-person interview survey, mean systolic blood pressure was 119 (standard deviation 17) mm Hg and mean HbA1c concentrations was 5.3% (standard deviation 0.6%). Our causal forest model showed heterogeneity in the effect of Medicaid coverage on systolic blood pressure and HbA1c. Individuals with lower baseline healthcare charges, for example, had higher predicted benefits from gaining Medicaid coverage. Medicaid coverage significantly lowered systolic blood pressure (-4.96 mm Hg (95% confidence interval -7.80 to -2.48)) for people predicted to benefit highly. HbA1c was also significantly reduced by Medicaid coverage for people with high predicted benefits, but the size was not clinically meaningful (-0.12% (-0.25% to -0.01%)).
Conclusions:
Although Medicaid coverage did not improve cardiovascular risk factors on average, substantial heterogeneity was noted in the effects within that population. Individuals with high predicted benefits were more likely to have no or low prior healthcare charges, for example. Our findings suggest that Medicaid coverage leads to improved cardiovascular risk factors for some, particularly for blood pressure, although those benefits may be diluted by individuals who did not experience benefits.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
09:15Differential Effects of Lipid-lowering Drugs in Modulating Morphology of Cholesterol Particles
Published on: November 10, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Longitudinal Studies
Exercise and Cardiovascular Response
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications