Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
Updating the no-history method in intraocular lens power calculation after myopic laser vision correction
H John Shammas1, David L Cooke, Kamran M Riaz
1From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California, the Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California (H.J. Shammas); the Shammas Eye Medical Center, Lynwood, California (H.J. Shammas, M.C. Shammas); Great Lakes Eye Care, St. Joseph, Michigan and the Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan (Cooke); the Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (Riaz, Bleeker); the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute at the Lennar Foundation Medical Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida (Tonk, Anter, Suraneni, S. Leal).
Purpose:
To describe the Shammas-Cooke formula, an updated no-history (NH) formula for IOL calculation in eyes with prior myopic laser vision correction (M-LVC), and to compare the results with the Shammas PL, Haigis-L, and Barrett True-K NH formulas.
Setting:
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (BPEI), The Lennar Foundation Medical Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; Dean A. McGee Eye Institute (DMEI), University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and private practice, Lynwood, California, and St Joseph, Michigan.
Design:
Retrospective observational study.
Methods:
We analyzed 2 large series of cataractous eyes with prior M-LVC. The training set (BPEI series of 330 eyes) was used to derive the new corneal power conversion equation to be used in the new Shammas-Cooke formula and the testing set (165 eyes of 165 patients in the DMEI series) to compare the updated formula with 3 other M-LVC NH formulas on the ASCRS calculator: Shammas PL, Haigis-L, and Barrett True-K NH.
Results:
Mean prediction error was 0.09 ± 0.56 diopters (D), -0.44 ± 0.61 D, -0.47 ± 0.59 D, and -0.18 ± 0.56 D and the mean absolute error was 0.43 D, 0.60 D, 0.61 D, and 0.45 D for the Shammas-Cooke, Shammas PL, Haigis-L, and Barrett True-K NH, respectively. The percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D was 66.7% vs 47.9%, 48.5%, and 65.5%, respectively.
Conclusions:
The Shammas-Cooke formula performed better than the Shammas PL and Haigis-L (P < .001 for both) and as well as the Barrett True-K NH formula (P = .923).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Glaucoma: Overview
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment

