Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Exploring non-covalent interactions in excited states: beyond aromatic excimer models
1School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. lars.goerigk@unimelb.edu.au.
Abstract:
Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) offers a relatively accurate and inexpensive approach for excited state calculations. However, conventional TD-DFT may suffer from the same poor description of non-covalent interactions (NCIs) which is known from ground-state DFT. In this work we present a comprehensive benchmark study of TD-DFT for excited-state NCIs. This is achieved by calculating dissociation curves for excited complexes ('exciplexes'), whose binding strength depends on excited-state NCIs including electrostatics, Pauli repulsion, charge-transfer, and London dispersion. Reference dissociation curves are calculated with the reasonably accurate wave function method SCS-CC2/CBS(3,4) which is used to benchmark a range of TD-DFT methods. Additionally, we test the effect of ground-state dispersion corrections, DFT-D3(BJ) and VV10, for exciplex binding. Overall, we find that TD-DFT methods generally under-bind exciplexes which can be explained by the missing dispersion forces. Underbinding errors reduce going up the rungs of Jacob's ladder. Further, the D3(BJ) dispersion correction is essential for good accuracy in most cases. Likewise, the VV10-type non-local kernel yields relatively low errors and has comparable performance in either its fully self-consistent implementation or as a post-SCF additive correction, but its impact is solely on ground-state energies and not on excitation energies. From our analysis, the most robust TD-DFT methods for exciplexes with localised excitations in their equilibrium and non-equilibrium geometries are the double hybrids B2GP-PLYP-D3(BJ) and B2PLYP-D3(BJ). Their range-separated versions ωB2(GP-)PLYP-D3(BJ) or the spin-opposite scaled, range-separated double hybrid SOS-ωB88PP86 can be recommended when charge transfer plays a role in the excitations. We also identify the need for a state-specific dispersion correction as the next step for improved TD-DFT performance.
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Aromatic and Antiaromatic Compounds
Variables Affecting Phosphorescence and Fluorescence
Molecular Spectroscopy: Absorption and Emission
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Photochemical Electrocyclic Reactions: Stereochemistry
Selection Rules: Photochemical Activation

