Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.3K

Advanced technology in shoulder arthroplasty.

Jack Zhong1, Michael Boin1, Joseph D Zuckerman1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Shoulder & Elbow Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

Shoulder & Elbow
|September 25, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Current Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models Exhibit Sycophantic Behavior in Orthopaedic Contexts.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same author

The ABCs of shoulder measurements.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2026
Same author

The impact of three-dimensional planning and navigation on augmented baseplate use and screw length in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Shoulder & elbow·2026
Same author

Reassessing the arthroplasty landscape: updated incidence and future projections of shoulder arthroplasty compared with hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2026
Same author

Current practices of infection prevention for primary shoulder arthroplasty: A survey of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Society members.

Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)·2026
Same author

Treatment Alternatives for Displaced Closed Humeral Shaft Fractures: Practical Implications for Shared Decision-Making from a Randomized Pragmatic Trial: Commentary on an article by Cyrill Suter, MD, et al.: " Cost-Effectiveness of Surgery Versus Functional Bracing for Humeral Shaft Fractures in Adults. A Prespecified Economic Evaluation of the Finnish Shaft of the Humerus (FISH) Trial ".

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same journal

Preoperative thoracic kyphosis influences clinical outcomes and joint range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective study from the FP-UCBM shoulder study group.

Shoulder & elbow·2026
Same journal

Scapula-to-scapula tethering for the treatment of scapulothoracic abnormal motion: A novel technique and case series.

Shoulder & elbow·2026
Same journal

The safety of percutaneous screw placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture: A cadaveric study.

Shoulder & elbow·2026
Same journal

Long-term corticosteroid use elevates 90-day medical complications but not 5-year surgical complications after shoulder arthroplasty.

Shoulder & elbow·2026
Same journal

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the Pennsylvania Shoulder Score.

Shoulder & elbow·2026
Same journal

Temporal trends and estimated lifetime attributable radiation risk of preoperative planning computed tomography for primary shoulder arthroplasty.

Shoulder & elbow·2026
See all related articles

Advanced glenoid component positioning technologies like preoperative planning software, patient-specific instrumentation, and navigation show improved accuracy in total shoulder arthroplasty. However, clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness require further investigation.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Medical imaging

Background:

  • Accurate glenoid component positioning is crucial but challenging in total shoulder arthroplasty.
  • Freehand techniques and 2D CT-based planning have limitations in accuracy, precision, and deformity correction.
  • Varying outcomes are reported with traditional methods for glenoid component placement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy and clinical benefits of advanced technologies for glenoid component placement in total shoulder arthroplasty.
  • To compare preoperative planning software (PPS), patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), and intraoperative navigation (NAV) against standard techniques.
  • To review emerging technologies like virtual/mixed-reality and robotic-assisted surgery for future applications.

Main Methods:

Keywords:
anatomicarthroplastyaugmented realitycomputer assisted navigationglenoid componentguide pinpatient specific instrumentationpreoperative planning softwarereverseroboticshouldervirtual reality

More Related Videos

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
10:10

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Published on: July 5, 2011

43.2K
Augmented Reality Navigation-Guided Core Decompression for Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head
06:17

Augmented Reality Navigation-Guided Core Decompression for Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head

Published on: April 12, 2022

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.3K
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
10:10

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Published on: July 5, 2011

43.2K
Augmented Reality Navigation-Guided Core Decompression for Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head
06:17

Augmented Reality Navigation-Guided Core Decompression for Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head

Published on: April 12, 2022

3.6K
  • A literature search was conducted on published studies comparing glenoid component placement accuracy.
  • Studies focused on comparing PPS, PSI, and NAV with freehand techniques.
  • The review assessed improvements in surgical and patient outcomes, as well as deformity correction.

Main Results:

  • Preoperative planning software, patient-specific instrumentation, and navigation demonstrate enhanced accuracy compared to freehand methods.
  • These advanced techniques show potential for improved implant placement and deformity correction.
  • Current literature lacks sufficient data on the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of these newer technologies.

Conclusions:

  • Advanced technologies like PPS, PSI, and NAV improve glenoid component accuracy in total shoulder arthroplasty.
  • Further research is needed to establish the clinical efficacy and economic viability of these methods.
  • Future developments include virtual/mixed-reality and robotic systems for shoulder surgery.