Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

06:15
Author Spotlight: Anterior HR-OCT as a Non-Invasive Tool for Characterizing Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia
Published on: August 9, 2024
1.1K
Corneal densitometry measurements comparison between anterior segment OCT and scheimpflug imaging
Enrico Lupardi1,2, Antonio Moramarco3,4, Federico Cassini3,4
1IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. enrico.lupardi@gmail.com.
International Ophthalmology
|September 25, 2024
Summary
The Casia 2 anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) device shows high repeatability for corneal densitometry (CD) measurements in healthy eyes. However, its readings are not interchangeable with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Corneal Imaging
- Biomedical Optics
Background:
- Corneal densitometry (CD) is crucial for assessing corneal transparency.
- Comparing measurement repeatability and agreement between different imaging devices is essential for clinical application.
- Understanding the correlation of CD with demographic factors aids in interpreting results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the repeatability and agreement of corneal densitometry (CD) measurements between an anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) device (Casia 2) and a Scheimpflug camera system (Pentacam AXL Wave).
- To investigate the correlation of CD with age, gender, and central corneal thickness (CCT) in normal eyes.
Main Methods:
- Corneal densitometry (CD) measurements were acquired using Casia 2 and Pentacam AXL Wave in 96 healthy volunteers.
- Repeatability was assessed via intra-session test-retest variability, coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
- Agreement was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots, and correlation analysis was performed with age, gender, and CCT.
Main Results:
- Casia 2 demonstrated high repeatability (ICC > 0.9) with lower CoV (1.07%-2.25%) compared to Pentacam (1.91%-6.89%) across corneal zones.
- Significant bias was observed between the two devices across all corneal zones.
- Corneal densitometry (CD) values showed a positive correlation with age, except for the central zone (zone 1) with Pentacam.
Conclusions:
- Casia 2 is a reliable tool for assessing corneal transparency in healthy individuals.
- Measurements from Casia 2 and Pentacam are not interchangeable due to observed bias.
- The AS-OCT device may offer greater sensitivity for detecting age-related CD changes in the central cornea.

