Differences in total plaque burden between plaque rupture and plaque erosion: A combined computed tomography

Takayuki Niida1, Eisuke Usui2, Keishi Suzuki1

  • 1Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Insights

Patients with plaque rupture have significantly greater total plaque burden, including non-calcified and calcified plaque, compared to those with plaque erosion. This finding highlights differences in atherosclerotic disease in acute coronary syndromes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Radiology
  • Pathology

Background:

  • Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) assesses atherosclerotic plaque burden.
  • No prior studies linked culprit lesion pathology to total plaque burden in acute coronary syndromes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare total plaque burden between patients with plaque rupture versus plaque erosion.

Main Methods:

  • 232 patients with first non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome underwent CTA and optical coherence tomography.
  • Semi-automated software quantified plaque burden, defining low-density non-calcified plaque (LDNCP) <30 Hounsfield units.
  • Coronary arteries assessed using the modified 17-segment American Heart Association model.

Main Results:

  • Plaque rupture occurred in 125 patients (53.9%), plaque erosion in 107 (46.1%).
  • Significantly greater total plaque burden (48.2% vs 44.1%), non-calcified plaque (NCP) burden (46.6% vs 43.0%), LDNCP burden (2.3% vs 1.7%), and calcified plaque (CP) burden (0.8% vs 0.4%) were observed in plaque rupture vs. erosion groups.
  • All comparisons showed statistical significance (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

  • Patients with plaque rupture exhibit a greater total plaque burden, NCP, LDNCP, and CP burden compared to those with plaque erosion.
  • These findings suggest distinct plaque characteristics based on underlying pathology in acute coronary syndromes.
Abstract