Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
How Do Changes in Femoral Anteversion Impact Femoral Rotation and Anterior Offset After Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Douglas A Dennis1, Jason A Bryman2, Gerard H Smith3
1Colorado Joint Replacement, Denver, Colorado; Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Background:
The impact of femoral anteversion changes on femoral rotation and anterior offset following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been well studied. This study therefore investigated the relationship among femoral anteversion, anterior offset, and femoral rotation before and after THA.
Methods:
There were 995 patients who had staged primary bilateral THAs who received a preoperative supine computerized axial tomography (CT) scan, following a standardized protocol, for surgical planning prior to each THA. The following measurements were performed for the first operative hip preoperatively and postoperatively on the first and second CT scans, respectively: femoral anatomic anteversion, defined as the angle between the native femoral neck or stem neck axis and the posterior condylar axis; femoral rotation, defined as the angle of the posterior condylar axis relative to the coronal plane of the CT; and femoral anterior offset, defined as the shortest distance between the femoral head center and a femoral plane containing the epicondyles and the piriformis fossa. The mean time between imagings was 11 months (range, 2 to 44). Associations are described using linear regression (β = slope) and Pearson correlation (r) coefficients. A t distribution was used for testing correlation.
Results:
Femoral anteversion correlated with femoral anterior offset preoperatively (β = 0.565, r = 0.914, P < 0.001) and postoperatively (β = 0.671, r = 0.958, P < 0.001), and with femoral rotation preoperatively (β = 0.623, r = 0.575, P < 0.001) and postoperatively (β = 0.459, r = 0.517, P < 0.001). Increasing anteversion from preoperatively to postoperatively increased anterior offset (β = 0.621, r = 0.908, P < 0.001) and femoral internal rotation (IR) (β = 0.241, r = 0.273, P < 0.001). Patients who had >20° increase in anteversion (mean increase 26°, range 20 to 40.5°, n = 71) had a mean increase in femoral IR of 9.6 ± 9.8°.
Conclusions:
Increasing femoral anteversion increases anterior offset and IR of the femur, with approximately a 1° increase in IR for every 4° increase in anteversion on average. Surgeons should appreciate the implications of changing anteversion during THA planning.
