Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025
Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
Published on: October 6, 2023
Improving Practice in a Head and Neck Oncology Clinic Using the PRO-CTCAE Tool
Rose Ann Ruddy1, Brigit Carter2, Maryanne Giuliante1
1From Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Montvale, New Jersey.
Background:
Patients with head and neck cancer undergoing treatment report many side effects. Using patient-reported outcomes can assist with care management.
Objectives:
The purpose of this quality improvement project was to implement the patient-reported outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) measurement system, reduce patient hydration visits, and measure provider satisfaction with the PRO-CTCAE survey.
Methods:
Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS software. Descriptive statistics for means were used to summarize the data for survey completion rate and for the provider satisfaction questionnaire. A Fisher's exact test was used to compare hydration visits before and after implementation of the PRO-CTCAE survey.
Findings:
The PRO-CTCAE surveys had a response rate of 91.2% (323/354) when telehealth visits were omitted. Hydration in the presurvey group was 23.5% (150/637) and in the postsurvey group was 38.5% (165/429), a 15% absolute percentage increase (Fisher's exact p < .001). Among providers, the positive response rate was 100% for five questions and 88.9% for two questions.
Implications:
The PRO-CTCAE survey allowed the patient to report their symptoms prior to discussing them with their provider. Providers were able to expedite symptom management and get information to patients in a timely manner. The PRO-CTCAE survey should be considered a part of a multidisciplinary approach to caring for patients.
