Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation and Microwave Ablation for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common critical type of hepatic cancer worldwide. Recent guidelines have considered ablative therapeutic approaches as the primary option for managing early-stage surgically untreatable HCC. Among these therapies, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) have attained a significant role due to their efficacy and theoretical advantages. This review aims to compare and analyze the efficacy and safety of two common modalities, i.e., MWA and RFA, in the management of HCC. The literature search included PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and Ovid for articles published until 2024. The outcomes included the local tumor progression (LTP), complete ablation (CA), the overall survival (OS) rate, or major complications. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. The systematic review included six randomized controlled trials, including 826 patients. The findings revealed that MWA resulted in lower LTP and higher CA rates compared to RFA. However, the effect of complications was higher in the MWA therapy group. Despite that, the differences between all parameters were not significant. Statistical significance was not evident in the OS rates between the two modalities. Three studies found comparable survival rates between the two modalities, while one study reported similar local tumor recurrence-free survival rates between the two approaches. Both techniques appear to be effective and safe for the management of liver tumors, providing clinicians with valuable options for personalized patient care. Further high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings and guide clinical decision-making.