Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

An In Vitro Enzymatic Assay to Measure Transcription Inhibition by GalliumIII and H3 5,10,15-trispentafluorophenylcorroles
Published on: March 18, 2015
Different DNA Binding and Damage Mode between Anticancer Antibiotics Trioxacarcin A and LL-D49194α1
Ruo-Qin Gao1, Xiao-Dong Hu1, Qiang Zhou1
1State Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China.
Abstract:
Trioxacarcin A (TXN) is a highly potent cytotoxic antibiotic with remarkable structural complexity. The crystal structure of TXN bound to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) suggested that the TXN interaction might depend on positions of two sugar subunits on the minor and major grooves of dsDNA. LL-D49194α1 (LLD) is a TXN analogue bearing the same polycyclic polyketide scaffold with a distinct glycosylation pattern. Although LLD was in a phase I clinical trial, how LLD binds to dsDNA remains unclear. Here, we solved the solution structures at high resolutions of palindromic 2″-fluorine-labeled guanine-containing duplex d(A1A2C3C4GFGFT7T8)2 and of its stable LLD and TXN covalently bound complexes. Combined with biochemical assays, we found that TXN-alkylated dsDNA would tend to keep DNA helix conformation, while LLD-alkylated dsDNA lost its stability more than TXN-alkylated dsDNA, leading to dsDNA denaturation. Thus, despite lower cytotoxicity in vitro, the differences of sugar substitutions in LLD caused greater DNA damage than TXN, thereby bringing about a completely new biological effect.
Insights
Trioxacarcin A (TXN) and its analogue LL-D49194α1 (LLD) bind to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). LLD causes greater DNA damage and denaturation than TXN, leading to distinct biological effects.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Drug Discovery
- Structural Biology
Background:
- Trioxacarcin A (TXN) is a potent cytotoxic antibiotic.
- LL-D49194α1 (LLD) is a TXN analogue with a distinct glycosylation pattern, previously in clinical trials.
- The DNA binding mechanism of LLD remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate the high-resolution solution structures of dsDNA bound to TXN and LLD.
- To compare the DNA binding and damaging effects of TXN and LLD.
- To understand the biological consequences of differing DNA interactions.
Main Methods:
- High-resolution solution structure determination of fluorinated dsDNA and its complexes with TXN and LLD.
- Biochemical assays to assess DNA stability and damage.
- Comparative analysis of TXN- and LLD-alkylated dsDNA.
Main Results:
- The study determined the structures of dsDNA covalently bound to TXN and LLD.
- TXN-alkylated dsDNA maintained helix conformation.
- LLD-alkylated dsDNA showed reduced stability and increased denaturation compared to TXN-alkylated dsDNA.
- LLD induced greater DNA damage despite lower in vitro cytotoxicity.
Conclusions:
- Differences in sugar substitutions between TXN and LLD significantly alter their DNA binding and damaging properties.
- LLD's distinct interaction with dsDNA leads to greater DNA instability and denaturation, resulting in unique biological effects.
- This research provides insights into the structure-activity relationships of TXN analogues for potential therapeutic development.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Drug-Receptor Bonds
In...

