Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

55.1K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.1K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

60.1K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.1K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combining Statistical Evidence When Evidence Is Measured by Relative Belief.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

MICAL2 Promotes Pancreatic Cancer Growth and Metastasis.

Cancer research·2025
Same author

HMGA2 Expression Predicts Subtype, Survival, and Treatment Outcome in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2024
Same author

On some problems of Bayesian region construction with guaranteed coverages.

Statistical papers (Berlin, Germany)·2024
Same author

INPP4B promotes PDAC aggressiveness via PIKfyve and TRPML-1-mediated lysosomal exocytosis.

The Journal of cell biology·2024
Same author

hENT1 as a Predictive Biomarker in PDAC-Response.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.9K

Relative Belief Inferences from Decision Theory.

Michael Evans1, Gun Ho Jang2

  • 1Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|September 27, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Relative belief inferences, a method for statistical analysis, are demonstrated to function as Bayes rules. These inferences offer optimal properties and are based on a direct measure of statistical evidence.

Keywords:
Bayes rulesBayesian inferenceBayesian-unbiasednessadmissibilityevidential inferencelimits of Bayes rulesloss functionsrelative beliefstatistical evidence

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.7K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

649

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.9K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.7K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

649

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Decision Theory
  • Probability Theory

Background:

  • Bayes rules are fundamental in statistical inference.
  • Understanding relative belief is crucial for decision-making under uncertainty.
  • Existing methods may lack invariance or optimal properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate that relative belief inferences can be formulated as Bayes rules.
  • To explore the optimal properties of relative belief inferences.
  • To establish relative belief inferences as a direct measure of statistical evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Formulation of relative belief inferences using Bayes rules.
  • Analysis of invariance properties under reparameterization.
  • Evaluation of optimality criteria for statistical inferences.

Main Results:

  • Relative belief inferences are shown to arise as Bayes rules or limiting Bayes rules.
  • These inferences exhibit invariance under reparameterization.
  • Relative belief inferences possess optimal statistical properties.

Conclusions:

  • Relative belief inferences provide a robust framework for statistical analysis.
  • The framework offers a direct measure of statistical evidence.
  • Invariance and optimality enhance the utility of relative belief inferences in practice.