Peripheral Non-Contrast MR Angiography Using FBI: Scan Time and T2 Blurring Reduction with 2D Parallel Imaging

Non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (NC-MRA), including fresh blood imaging (FBI), is a suitable choice for evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). We evaluated standard FBI (sFBI) and centric ky-kz FBI (cFBI) acquisitions, using 1D and 2D parallel imaging factors (PIFs) to assess the trade-off between scan time and image quality due to blurring. The bilateral legs of four volunteers (mean age 33 years, two females) were imaged in the coronal plane using a body array coil with a posterior spine coil. Two types of sFBI and cFBI sequences with 1D PIF factor 5 in the phase encode (PE) direction (in-plane) and 2D PIF 3 (PE) × 2 (slice encode (SE)) (in-plane, through-slice) were studied. Image quality was evaluated by a radiologist, the vessel's signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured, and major vessel width was measured on the coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) and 80-degree MIP. Results showed significant time reductions from 184 to 206 s on average when using sFBI down to 98 to 162 s when using cFBI (p = 0.003). Similar SNRs (averaging 200 to 370 across all sequences and PIF) and CNRs (averaging 190 to 360) for all techniques (p > 0.08) were found. There was no significant difference in the image quality (averaging 4.0 to 4.5; p > 0.2) or vessel width (averaging 4.1 to 4.9 mm; p > 0.1) on coronal MIP due to sequence or PIF. However, vessel width measured using 80-degree MIP demonstrated a significantly wider vessel in cFBI (5.6 to 6.8 mm) compared to sFBI (4.5 to 4.7 mm) (p = 0.022), and in 1D (4.7 to 6.8 mm) compared to 2D (4.5 to 5.6 mm) (p < 0.05) PIF. This demonstrated a trade-off in T2 blurring between 1D and 2D PIF: 1D using a PIF of 5 shortened the acquisition window, resulting in sharper arterial blood vessels in coronal images but significant blur in the 80-degree MIP. Two-dimensional PIF for cFBI provided a good balance between shorter scan time (relative to sFBI) and good sharpness in both in- and through-plane, while no benefit of 2D PIF was seen for sFBI. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the usefulness of FBI-based techniques for peripheral artery imaging and underscored the need to strike a balance between scan time and image quality in different planes through the use of 2D parallel imaging.