Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

12:33
Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
Published on: December 31, 2013
8.8K
Differences in working memory function are associated with motor imagery-induced changes in spinal motor nerve
Yuki Fukumoto1,2, Keisuke Fujii3, Marina Todo4,5
1Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kansai University of Health Sciences, 2-11-1 Wakaba Sennangun, Kumatori, Osaka, 590-0482, Japan. fukumoto@kansai.ac.jp.
Cognitive Processing
|September 27, 2024
Summary
Individual differences in working memory, specifically the phonological loop, influence motor imagery effectiveness. Poor phonological loop function correlated with increased spinal motor nerve excitability and improved finger dexterity after motor imagery.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Motor Control
Background:
- Motor imagery (MI) effectiveness research often overlooks individual differences.
- Understanding how cognitive factors modulate MI is crucial for optimizing its application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of individual working memory components on motor imagery effectiveness.
- To explore the relationship between cognitive function, finger dexterity, and spinal motor nerve excitability during MI.
Main Methods:
- Forty-six healthy subjects performed Stroop Test (central executive) and reverse chanting (phonological loop).
- Finger dexterity (Purdue Pegboard) and spinal motor nerve excitability (F-wave amplitude F/M ratio) were measured before and during kinesthetic motor imagery.
- Subjects were categorized into 'Good' and 'Poor' cognitive function groups based on performance.
Main Results:
- An interaction was observed between the phonological loop and changes in F-wave amplitude and Peg score.
- Finger dexterity significantly improved post-MI in both groups.
- Spinal motor nerve excitability increased during MI only in the 'Poor' phonological loop group.
- No significant interactions were found concerning the central executive component.
Conclusions:
- Individual differences in the phonological loop, a component of working memory, may influence motor imagery's effects on motor performance and neural excitability.
- The central executive component of working memory does not appear to modulate MI-induced changes in finger dexterity or spinal motor nerve excitability.
- Further research is warranted to elucidate the specific mechanisms linking phonological loop function to motor imagery outcomes.

