Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
Published on: February 2, 2020
Effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment adapted to primary care when provided by a nurse or a general
Veronique Orcel1,2, Leon Banh1, Sylvie Bastuji-Garin2
1Department of General Practice, Univ Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Health Faculty, 8 Rue du Général Sarrail, Creteil, 94010, France.
Background:
The benefits of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) are well established for hospital care but less so for primary care. Our primary objective was to assess the effect of two multifaceted interventions based on a CGA adapted for primary care on a composite criterion combining all-cause mortality, emergency department visits, unplanned hospital admissions, and institutionalisation.
Methods:
This open-label, pragmatic, three-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial involved 39 general practices in France. It included 634 patients aged 70 years or over with chronic health conditions and/or an unplanned hospital admission in the past 3 months, between 05/2016 and 08/2018. Interventions were in arm 1: a systematic nurse-led CGA; arm 2: a GP-led CGA, at the GP's discretion; arm 3: standard care. The primary composite endpoint was assessed at 12 months. The secondary endpoints included: components of the composite endpoint, health-related quality of life (Duke Health Profile), functional status (Katz Activities of Daily Living Index) and medications (number) at 12 months. Pairwise comparisons between the experimental groups and the control were tested. The main analysis was performed on the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, after imputing missing information and adjusting for baseline imbalances by mixed effects regressions.
Results:
For the primary composite outcome, no statistically significant difference was found between arm 1 and the control (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.81 [95%CI 0.54-1.21], P = 0.31), whereas arm 2 and the control differed significantly (aOR = 0.60 [0.39-0.93], P = 0.022). A statistically lower risk of unplanned hospital admission in arm 2 vs control (aOR = 0.57 [0.36-0.92], P = 0.020)) was observed, while no statistically significant differences were found for the other components and between arm 1 and the control. None of the other secondary endpoints differed between arms.
Conclusions:
Our study led in community-dwelling older patients with chronic conditions found no significant effect of a CGA adapted for primary care on mortality, functional independence and quality of life, but suggests that a GP-led CGA may reduce the risk of unplanned hospital admission. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating CGA into clinical practice and highlights its potential benefits when applied on a case-by-case basis, guided by the GPs who develop the resulting PCP.
Trial Registration:
NCT02664454.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Nursing Evaluation
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Planning Nursing Care I
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...

