Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
Secondary analysis of hand-offs in internal medicine using the I-PASS mnemonic
Aurélie Huber1, Belinda Moyano2, Katherine Blondon2,3
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. aurelie.huber@hug.ch.
Background:
Miscommunications account for up to 80% of preventable medical errors. Mnemonics like I-PASS (Illness severity, Patient summary, Actions list, Situation awareness, Synthesis) have demonstrated a positive impact on reducing error rates. Currently, physicians at our hospital do not follow a specific structure during hand-offs. We aimed to compare current hand-offs without prior training to a gold standard and the I-PASS tool in terms of content and sequence.
Methods:
This study is a secondary analysis of data collected during a simulation study of a Friday evening hand-off to the night resident at University Hospitals of Geneva. Thirty physicians received a hand-off of four patients and managed two other patients through nursing pages at the start of the night shift, generating six sign-outs each, totaling 177 sign-outs. A focus group of three senior doctors defined the gold standard (GS) by consensus on the essential content of each sign-out. The analysis focused on the rates of relevance (ratio of information considered relevant by the GS) and completeness (proportion of transmitted elements out of all expected elements of the GS), and the distribution and sequence of the first four I-PASS categories.
Results:
Relevance and completeness rates were 37.2% ± 0.07 and 51.9% ± 0.1, respectively, with no significant difference between residents and supervisors. There was a positive correlation between total hand-off time and relevance (residents: R2 = 0.62; supervisors: R2 = 0.67) and completeness (residents: R2 = 0.32; supervisors: R2 = 0.56). The distribution of I-PASS categories was highly skewed in both the GS (I = 2%, P = 72%, A = 17%, S = 9%) and participants (I = 6%, P = 73%, A = 14%, S = 7%), with significant differences in categories A (p = 0.046) and I (p ≤ 0.001). Sequences of I-PASS categories generally followed a P-A-S-I pattern. The first S category was frequently absent, and only one participant began by announcing the case severity as suggested by I-PASS.
Conclusion:
We identified gaps between current medical sign-outs in our institution's general internal medicine division and the I-PASS structure. We recommend implementing the I-PASS mnemonic, emphasizing the "I" category at the start and the "S" category to anticipate and prevent complications. Future studies should assess the impact of this recommendation, adapt the mnemonic elements to the context, and introduce specific hand-off training for senior medical students.
Insights
Medical hand-offs lack structure, leading to errors. Implementing the I-PASS (Illness severity, Patient summary, Actions list, Situation awareness, Synthesis) mnemonic can improve patient safety by standardizing communication.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Patient Safety
- Clinical Communication
Background:
- Miscommunications contribute to up to 80% of preventable medical errors.
- Standardized mnemonics like I-PASS improve error reduction.
- Physicians in this institution lack a structured approach to patient hand-offs.
Purpose of the Study:
- Compare current unstructured hand-offs to a gold standard and the I-PASS tool.
- Evaluate content relevance and completeness of medical sign-outs.
- Analyze the sequence of information during patient hand-offs.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of a simulation study involving 30 physicians and 177 sign-outs.
- Defined a gold standard for essential sign-out content via expert consensus.
- Assessed relevance, completeness, and I-PASS category distribution/sequence.
Main Results:
- Relevance and completeness rates were low (37.2% and 51.9%, respectively).
- Higher hand-off time correlated positively with relevance and completeness.
- I-PASS category distribution differed significantly from the standard, with 'P' (Patient summary) dominating and 'I' (Illness severity) and 'S' (Synthesis) often misplaced or omitted.
Conclusions:
- Significant gaps exist between current medical sign-outs and the I-PASS structure.
- Recommend implementing I-PASS, emphasizing 'I' and 'S' categories.
- Suggest future studies to assess impact, adapt the mnemonic, and provide training.
More Related Videos
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Types of Reports I: Hands-off Report
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation