Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

09:21
Experiments on Ultrasonic Lubrication Using a Piezoelectrically-assisted Tribometer and Optical Profilometer
Published on: September 28, 2015
12.5K
A Proposed Non-Destructive Method Based on Sphere Launching and Piezoelectric Diaphragm
Cristiano Soares Junior1, Paulo Roberto Aguiar1, Doriana M D'Addona2
1Department of Electrical Engineering, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. Eng. Luiz Edmundo C. Coube 14-01, Bauru 17033-360, Brazil.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|September 28, 2024
Summary
A new acoustic emission method using a metallic sphere offers higher repeatability than traditional pencil-lead break tests for detecting damage in composite and aluminum structures.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Mechanical Engineering
- Non-Destructive Testing
Background:
- Acoustic emission (AE) is a valuable technique for monitoring material integrity.
- Traditional AE methods like pencil-lead break (PLB) can suffer from inconsistency.
- Developing reproducible and reliable AE methods is crucial for structural health monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a reproducible acoustic emission (AE) method using a metallic sphere impact.
- To compare the repeatability and effectiveness of the sphere impact method against the traditional pencil-lead break (PLB) test.
- To assess the AE method's capability in damage detection for different material structures.
Main Methods:
- A novel AE method was developed utilizing a metallic sphere launched by a low-cost piezoelectric diaphragm.
- Comparative tests were performed on carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) and aluminum structures.
- The proposed sphere impact method was compared with standard pencil-lead break (PLB) tests under varying impact conditions.
Main Results:
- The sphere impact AE method demonstrated significantly higher repeatability compared to the PLB method.
- The PLB method showed greater susceptibility to human error and variability.
- Both methods were effective in detecting damage, but the sphere impact method offered more consistent results.
Conclusions:
- The metallic sphere impact method provides a more reproducible and reliable approach for acoustic emission testing.
- This method is a viable alternative to PLB for damage detection in composite and metallic materials.
- The findings support the adoption of this improved AE technique for structural health monitoring applications.

