Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly
Published on: March 11, 2022
The FeetMe® Insoles System: Repeatability, Standard Error of Measure, and Responsiveness
Nathan Martin1,2, Fabien Leboeuf2,3, Didier Pradon1,4
1Pôle Parasport-ISPC Synergies, CHU Raymond Poincaré, APHP, 92380 Garches, France.
Background:
Three-dimensional motion analysis using optoelectronic cameras and force platforms is typically used to quantify gait disorders. However, these systems have various limitations, particularly when assessing patients in an ecological environment. To address these limitations, several wearable devices have been developed. However, few studies have reported metrological information regarding their repeatability and sensitivity to change.
Methods:
A healthy adult performed 6 min walking tests with FeetMe® system insoles under different walking conditions overground and on a treadmill. The standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimum detectable differences (MDDs), and the effect size (ES) were calculated for spatio-temporal parameters, and the ground reaction force was calculated from the 16,000 steps recorded.
Results:
SEM values were below 3.9% for the ground reaction force and below 6.8% for spatio-temporal parameters. ES values were predominantly high, with 72.9% of cases between overground and treadmill conditions with induced asymmetry, and 64.5% of cases between treadmill conditions with and without induced asymmetry exhibiting an ES greater than 1.2. The minimum detectable differences ranged from 4.5% to 10.7% for ground reaction forces and 2.1% to 18.9% for spatio-temporal parameters.
Conclusion:
Our study demonstrated that the FeetMe® system is a reliable solution. The sensitivity to change showed that these instrumented insoles can effectively reflect patient asymmetry and progress.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Random and Systematic Errors
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Accuracy and Precision
Standard Error of the Mean
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...

