Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Microstate and Omega Complexity Analyses of the Resting-state Electroencephalography
Published on: June 15, 2018
Towards the definition of a standard in TMS-EEG data preprocessing.
A Brancaccio1, D Tabarelli1, A Zazio2
1Center for Mind/Brain Sciences-CIMeC, University of Trento, I-38123 Trento, Italy.
This study compares three Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Electroencephalography (EEG) preprocessing pipelines. All pipelines effectively remove artifacts, but ARTIST uniquely increases inter-trial variability in the reconstructed brain signals.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Computational Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Combining non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) with electrophysiological recordings, like Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Electroencephalography (EEG), is vital for neuroscience research.
- TMS-EEG integration faces challenges due to magnetic pulse-induced artifacts in EEG data, necessitating robust preprocessing pipelines.
- Existing preprocessing methods for TMS-EEG artifacts show variability, impacting research reproducibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively characterize and compare the performance of three leading TMS-EEG artifact preprocessing pipelines: ARTIST, TESA, and SOUND/SSP-SIR.
- To assess the spatio-temporal precision and reliability of artifact reconstruction for each pipeline.
- To evaluate the impact of each pipeline on inter-trial variability in TMS-EEG data.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a synthetic TMS-EEG signal with a known ground-truth to objectively evaluate artifact removal.
- Applied and compared three distinct preprocessing pipelines: ARTIST, TESA, and SOUND/SSP-SIR.
- Quantitatively assessed pipeline performance based on artifact removal efficiency and signal reconstruction accuracy.
Main Results:
- All evaluated pipelines demonstrated effective artifact removal from TMS-EEG signals.
- Differences were observed in the spatio-temporal precision of reconstructing the original, artifact-free signal.
- The ARTIST pipeline was found to introduce non-intrinsic inter-trial variability into the processed EEG data.
Conclusions:
- While ARTIST, TESA, and SOUND/SSP-SIR are effective for TMS-EEG artifact removal, researchers must consider their differential impact on signal fidelity and variability.
- The choice of preprocessing pipeline can influence the assessment of neural activity and inter-trial consistency.
- This comparative analysis using synthetic data provides a quantitative reference for selecting appropriate TMS-EEG preprocessing methods.
More Related Videos
08:23A Multimodal Imaging- and Stimulation-based Method of Evaluating Connectivity-related Brain Excitability in Patients with Epilepsy
Published on: November 13, 2016
09:36Extracting Visual Evoked Potentials from EEG Data Recorded During fMRI-guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: May 12, 2014