Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The debate over diagnosis related groups.

A D Spiegel, F Kavaler

    Journal of Community Health
    |January 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    The Prospective Payment System (PPS), utilizing Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs), faces ongoing debate regarding its impact on healthcare administration and quality of care. Key concerns involve data, patient classification, resource allocation, and potential negative effects on medical standards.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Chloroform-induced insanity defence confounds lawyer Lincoln.

    History of psychiatry·2001
    Same author

    Abraham Lincoln's suit against a medical imposter who assaulted his client.

    Journal of community health·2001
    Same author

    Are physicians aware of the risks of alternative medicine?

    Journal of community health·2001
    Same author

    Uncontrollable frenzy and a unique temporary insanity plea.

    Journal of community health·2000
    Same author

    Dr. John Frederick May and the identification of John Wilkes Booth's body.

    Journal of community health·1998
    Same author

    The insanity plea in early nineteenth century America.

    Journal of community health·1998

    Area of Science:

    • Health Services Research
    • Healthcare Management
    • Medical Economics

    Background:

    • The implementation of the Prospective Payment System (PPS) introduced Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) as a primary classification method in healthcare.
    • This system significantly altered healthcare reimbursement and administrative practices, prompting extensive discussion.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review and categorize the multifaceted debates surrounding the PPS and DRG system.
    • To synthesize professional and organizational viewpoints on the advantages and disadvantages of this payment mechanism.

    Main Methods:

    • A comprehensive review of existing literature was conducted.
    • Discussions and opinions were systematically grouped into thematic categories: administration/management, DRG system specifics, and quality of care implications.

    Main Results:

    • Key areas of contention identified include data utilization, the meaningfulness of medical classifications, resource management, and the potential for financial "gaming."
    • Further debated points encompass patient homogeneity, severity of illness adjustments, length of stay variations, technological constraints, and the perceived erosion of healthcare standards.

    Conclusions:

    • The PPS and DRG system present a complex interplay of administrative efficiency and potential challenges to quality of care.
    • Ongoing dialogue is crucial to address the identified limitations and optimize the system's effectiveness and equity.

    Related Experiment Videos