Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025
Three-Dimensional Preoperative Virtual Planning in Derotational Proximal Femoral Osteotomy
Published on: February 17, 2023
Adjusted planning based on the joint line convergence angle improves correction accuracy in the standing position
Ken Kumagai1, Shunsuke Yamada2, Shuntaro Nejima2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan. kumagai@yokohama-cu.ac.jp.
Background:
Postoperative change of the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) is known to be a factor affecting correction error in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). The purpose of this study was to assess whether preoperative planning that considers change of the JLCA can achieve accurate correction in the standing position after OWHTO.
Methods:
OWHTO was performed for 109 knees with osteoarthritis of the knee. The amount of angular correction was planned aiming to achieve mechanical valgus of 5° in 55 knees (conventional planning), and it was adjusted in 54 knees (adjusted planning) according to the preoperative JLCA as follows: not changed with JLCA ≤ 3°; decreased 1° with JLCA 4-6°; decreased 2° with JLCA 7-8°; and decreased 3° with JLCA ≥ 9°. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, JLCA, and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured on standing long-leg radiographs. Correction error ≤ 2º was defined as the acceptable range, and correction error > 2º was defined as an outlier.
Results:
The conventional planning group had a significantly greater postoperative HKA angle than the adjusted planning group (6.1º and 4.9º, respectively). The mean JLCA decreased from 4.8º to 2.6º in the conventional planning group and from 4.6º to 2.7º in the adjusted planning group. The conventional planning group had significantly greater postoperative MPTA than the adjusted planning group (96.2º and 94.7º, respectively). The rate of outliers with correction error > 2º was significantly lower in the adjusted planning group (9%) than in the conventional planning group (24%). The rate of the MPTA > 95º was significantly lower in the adjusted planning group (30%) than in the conventional planning group (69%).
Conclusions:
This study demonstrated that preoperative planning with adjustment of the correction angle according to the preoperative JLCA improved correction accuracy in the standing position after OWHTO.
