Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in paediatric patients for primary vs. secondary prevention
Jani Thuraiaiyah1, Berit Thornvig Philbert1, Annette Schophuus Jensen1
1Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Insights
Pediatric patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have high rates of appropriate therapy and complications, regardless of whether the ICD is for primary or secondary prevention. These outcomes were similar between the two prevention groups in this study.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for managing life-threatening arrhythmias in children, but decisions regarding their implantation are complex due to longer life expectancy and complication risks.
- While secondary prevention indications for ICDs are well-established, primary prevention requires careful risk-benefit evaluation considering sudden cardiac death versus device-related complications.
- Young patients stand to gain the most years of life from ICDs, underscoring the importance of understanding outcomes in this population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of pediatric patients who received an ICD for primary versus secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.
- To analyze complication rates, appropriate therapy, and mortality in children with ICDs.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective nationwide cohort study analyzed data from the Danish ICD registry for patients aged 15 years or younger at ICD implantation between 1982 and 2021.
- Data on demographics, complications (infections, lead failure, re-operation, arrhythmia-related mortality), and mortality were extracted from medical records.
- The primary endpoint was the first occurrence of appropriate therapy (shock or anti-tachycardia pacing) for ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation.
Main Results:
- Of 72 pediatric patients, 23 received ICDs for primary prevention and 49 for secondary prevention, with a median follow-up of 9.0 years.
- The 10-year cumulative incidence of appropriate therapy was 70%, with complication rates at 41% and inappropriate therapy rates at 15%.
- No significant differences in appropriate therapy, complications, or mortality were observed between the primary and secondary prevention groups.
Conclusions:
- In children, ICDs are more commonly implanted for secondary prevention (two-thirds of cases).
- Pediatric patients experience higher rates of appropriate therapy and complications compared to adults, though inappropriate therapy rates remain low.
- Outcomes for ICD implantation in children appear similar for both primary and secondary prevention indications.
Aims:
The decisions about placing an ICD in a child are more difficult than in an adult due to longer expected lifespan and the complication risk. Young patients gain the most years from ICDs, despite higher risk of device-related complications. The secondary prevention ICD indication is clear, and device is implanted regardless of potential complications. For primary prevention, risk of sudden cardiac death and complications need to be evaluated. We aimed to compare outcomes for primary and secondary prevention ICDs.
Methods And Results:
Retrospective nationwide cohort study including paediatric patients identified from the Danish ICD registry with ICD implanted at an age ≤ 15 from 1982-21. Demographics, complications (composite of device-related infections or lead-failure requiring re-operation, mortality because of arrhythmia, or unknown cause), and mortality were retrieved from medical charts. Endpoint was appropriate therapy (shock or anti-tachycardia pacing for ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation). Of 72 receiving an ICD, the majority had channelopathies (n = 34) or structural heart diseases (n = 28). ICDs were implanted in 23 patients for primary prevention and 49 for secondary prevention, at median ages of 13.8 and 11.6 years (P-value 0.01), respectively. Median follow-up was 9.0 (interquartile ranges: 4.7-13.5) years. The 10-year cumulative incidence of first appropriate therapy was 70%, with complication and inappropriate therapy rates at 41% and 15%, respectively. No difference was observed between prevention groups for all outcomes. Six patients died during follow-up.
Conclusion:
In children, two-thirds are secondary prevention ICDs. Children have higher appropriate therapy and complication rates than adults, while the inappropriate therapy rate was low.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers

