Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

BIBO stability of continuous and discrete -time systems

BIBO stability of continuous and discrete -time systems

System stability is a fundamental concept in signal processing, often assessed using convolution. For a system to be considered bounded-input bounded-output (BIBO) stable, any bounded input signal must produce a bounded output signal. A bounded input signal is one where the modulus does not exceed a certain constant at any point in time.
To determine the BIBO stability, the convolution integral is utilized when a bounded continuous-time input is applied to a Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) system.

Multimachine Stability

Multimachine Stability

Multimachine stability analysis is crucial for understanding the dynamics and stability of power systems with multiple synchronous machines. The objective is to solve the swing equations for a network of M machines connected to an N-bus power system.
In analyzing the system, the nodal equations represent the relationship between bus voltages, machine voltages, and machine currents. The nodal equation is given by:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Accuracy of 3 Intraoral and 1 Extraoral Digital Scanning Systems for Multiple Laminate Veneer Preparations: An In Vitro Study.

Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research·2026

Same author

Mandibular buccal shelf morphology among Indian adults using CBCT across class I, class II and class III malocclusions.

Bioinformation·2026

Same author

A Ten-Year Retrospective Analysis of Maxillofacial Trauma: Insights into Etiology, Demographics, and Management.

Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences·2026

Same author

Peri-implantitis: Etiology, prevention and management strategies.

Bioinformation·2025

Same author

Short versus standard-length implants: A systematic review on clinical outcomes and success rates.

Bioinformation·2025

Same author

Retrospective Review of Surgical Outcomes in Temporomandibular Joint Arthroscopy for Internal Derangement.

Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 24, 2026

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

Single-Piece Implant Systems and its Longterm Stability: An Evaluative Research.

Piyush Javiya¹, Kandra Rajakumari², Sravya Gorrepati³

¹Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, K. M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Piparia, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences

|September 30, 2024

Summary

Single-piece dental implants show comparable success rates and stability to two-piece systems, though with slightly more bone loss. Careful patient selection and technique are crucial for optimal outcomes with either implant type.

Keywords:

Implant success longstanding stability peri-implant bone loss single-piece implant two-piece implant

More Related Videos

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 24, 2026

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

Area of Science:

Dental Implantology
Biomaterials Science
Clinical Dentistry

Background:

Dental implant stability is crucial for long-term success.
Traditional two-piece implant systems are widely used.
Emerging single-piece implant systems offer potential advantages.

Purpose of the Study:

To retrospectively compare the long-term stability and success rates of single-piece versus two-piece dental implant systems.
To analyze factors influencing implant performance in a clinical setting.

Main Methods:

Retrospective analysis of patient records from 2010-2020.
Inclusion of patients who received either single- or two-piece implant systems.
Evaluation of implant success rates, stability via resonance frequency analysis (Osstell ISQ®), and peri-implant bone loss.

Main Results:

No significant difference in implant success rates (94.6% vs. 96.2%, P=0.412) or stability (ISQ scores: 72.4 vs. 74.8, P=0.086) between single-piece and two-piece systems.
Single-piece systems showed slightly higher peri-implant bone loss (1.8 mm vs. 1.4 mm, P=0.031).

Conclusions:

Single-piece implant systems are a viable alternative to two-piece systems, demonstrating comparable stability and success.
Meticulous patient selection, surgical technique, and monitoring are vital for minimizing complications and maximizing clinical outcomes with both implant types.
Further research into the design, biomechanics, and long-term performance of both implant systems is recommended to enhance patient care in implant dentistry.