Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
The laboratory test justified. An effective means to reduce routine laboratory testing
Insights
Implementing a clinician justification policy significantly reduced common clinical laboratory tests. This strategy lowered test volumes by requiring written rationales for ordering, particularly effective for frequently used tests.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Pathology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Clinical laboratory testing volume is a significant healthcare cost.
- Strategies to control test ordering are crucial for efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a clinician-oriented restriction policy on laboratory test ordering.
- To assess the impact of a written justification requirement on reducing test volumes.
Main Methods:
- Implemented a policy requiring written justification for laboratory test requests.
- Applied directed justification for specific tests (prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time) and nonspecific justification for leukocyte differentials.
- Extended the policy to general medical wards, focusing on common laboratory tests (BUN/creatinine, electrolytes).
Main Results:
- Directed justification reduced prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time by 44% (P < 0.001).
- Nonspecific justification reduced leukocyte differentials by 35% (P < 0.001).
- The broader policy reduced common tests (BUN/creatinine, electrolytes) by 28-45% without reviewing justification validity.
Conclusions:
- A simple clerical justification policy can significantly reduce the volume of common clinical laboratory tests.
- This approach allows clinicians to retain responsibility for test ordering while decreasing laboratory workload.
- The policy appears most effective for frequently ordered tests.
Abstract:
In an attempt to reduce clinical laboratory testing, a strategy was designed for a clinician-oriented restriction policy imposed on the laboratory test-ordering mechanism. The program examined the requirement of a written justification to accompany test requests. Directed justification, where specified conditions were required for test performance, was applied to the prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times and resulted in a mean reduction of 44% (P less than 0.001) in these tests; a nonspecific justification directive for leukocyte differentials, where any clinical condition listed generated the test, reduced differentials 35% (P less than 0.001). The justification policy then was extended more broadly and applied on a trial basis to general medical wards. Although no review was made on validity of listed test rationalizations, the justification process alone significantly reduced four common laboratory tests from 28% (BUN/creatinine) to 45% (electrolytes); significant reductions were not seen in less frequently ordered tests. The authors concluded that the most common clinical laboratory tests may be reduced by demanding that the clinician perform a clerical justification when requesting these tests. This mild restrictive policy in the ordering process allows the clinician to maintain responsibility over laboratory testing, while effectively reducing laboratory volume.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...

