Academic Radiology Physician Financial Compensation in the United States: Trends and Distribution

Background The overall trends in academic radiology physician compensation are not well studied. Purpose To assess recent trends in academic radiology financial compensation and distribution based on rank, gender, race/ethnicity, and geography in U.S. medical schools. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis used deidentified data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Faculty Salary Report, which collects information for full-time faculty at U.S. medical schools. Financial compensation data for full-time academic radiology faculty was collected from 2017 to 2023, stratified by rank, gender, race/ethnicity, and geography. The faculty salary report includes median, 25th, and 75th percentile compensation values for each rank, which were used to analyze trends with linear regression. Median compensation values were used to compare groups based on gender, race/ethnicity, and region. Results The AAMC Faculty Salary Report data for 2023 included responses for 5847 faculty members across all radiology departments, including 306 instructors, 2758 assistant professors, 1409 associate professors, 1004 full professors, 226 chiefs, and 144 chairs. On average, median faculty compensation increased by 2.6%-4.4% per year from 2017 to 2023, with the greatest increase (by 4.4% per year) at the instructor level and smaller increases (3.4%-2.6%) at the more senior ranks. Male faculty members were consistently compensated more than women at all ranks throughout the study period. The overall salary gap remained at 6% ($455 000 for women vs $483 000 for men) throughout the study period but increased numerically from $24 000 in 2019 to $28 000 in 2023. Black/African American faculty had a lower median compensation compared with White faculty (by 4% overall; $452 000 for Black/African American faculty vs $472 000 for White faculty) at all ranks except at professor rank. Instructor compensation in the Northeast region was substantially higher (by $278 000) than other regions, but this geographic differential did not exceed $35 000 at other ranks. Conclusion This study summarized the trends of full-time academic radiology faculty compensation and showed persistent salary inequities that should be addressed as part of a broader drive to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.