Preauricular versus intraoral condylectomy for the treatment of unilateral condylar hyperactivity

In this study we retrospectively reviewed our clinic's treatment of unilateral condylar hyperactivity (UCH). We used computer-guided proportional condylectomy, which was conducted both through preauricular and intraoral approaches, then analysed the advantages and disadvantages of the two techniques. A computer-guided treatment algorithm is also presented. We enrolled 42 patients diagnosed with clinical asymmetry, with or without associated dentofacial deformities, which had been confirmed by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to be UCH. These patients underwent proportional condylectomy: 26 of them had isolated proportional condylectomy, while 16 had proportional condylectomy with concomitant orthognathic surgery. The intraoral approach demonstrated a capacity and precision that was nearly equivalent to the extraoral approach. This mitigates the significant surgical risks associated with the extraoral approach, but it is important to acknowledge the learning curve associated with the intraoral approach. Utilising virtual surgical planning (VSP) and custom cutting guides is essential.