Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026

08:09
Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
11.4K
Intentionally unilateral prostatic artery embolization: Patient selection, technique and potential benefits
Hippocrates Moschouris1, Konstantinos Stamatiou2
1Department of Radiology, General Hospital "Tzanio", Piraeus 18536, Greece. hipmosch@gmail.com.
World Journal of Radiology
|October 2, 2024
Summary
Intentionally unilateral prostatic artery embolization (IU-PAE) in select patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia offers comparable outcomes to bilateral PAE. This approach significantly reduces procedure time and radiation exposure, enhancing patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Radiology
- Vascular Interventions
- Urologic Oncology
Background:
- Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is an effective treatment for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
- Technical challenges, including complex prostatic artery anatomy and bilateral catheterization, lead to long procedures and high radiation doses.
- Intentionally unilateral PAE (IU-PAE) is proposed to mitigate these disadvantages in selected patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the technique for intentionally unilateral PAE (IU-PAE).
- To evaluate the potential benefits of IU-PAE compared to bilateral PAE in terms of procedure efficiency and patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective single-center study of 13 patients undergoing IU-PAE over 2 years.
- Patient selection based on prostatic lobe opacification, asymmetric enlargement, or challenging pelvic artery anatomy.
- Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (iCEUS) used for monitoring prostatic infarction.
- Comparison with a control group undergoing bilateral PAE.
Main Results:
- IU-PAE group showed significantly shorter procedure times (45.8%), fluoroscopy times (35.9%), and radiation doses (45.4%) compared to the bilateral PAE group.
- Clinical and imaging outcomes were comparable between the IU-PAE and bilateral PAE groups.
- Smaller prostatic infarction extent in clinical failures of IU-PAE, as assessed by iCEUS.
Conclusions:
- IU-PAE is a viable option in selected BPH patients, offering reduced procedure time and radiation exposure.
- Outcomes of IU-PAE are comparable to bilateral PAE.
- iCEUS can aid in patient selection for IU-PAE.

