TAPP versus lichtenstein techniques for bilateral inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures performed worldwide. However, very few studies report data on the laparoscopic advantages of bilateral inguinal hernia (BIH) repair over the open approach. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effectiveness of the laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) technique with the open Lichtenstein repair technique (OLR) for the repair of BIH. A detailed literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library for comparative studies between TAPP and OLR techniques for repair of BIH. RevMan Version 5.4 was used for data analysis. The Inverse Variance statistical method was used to analyze the primary outcomes and the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method was used to analyze the secondary outcomes. The effect measure was reported as a Risk Ratio. There was no significant difference in recurrence between the two groups. A significant difference was seen in duration of post-operative hospital stay, operative time, pain score on VAS criteria on post-operative Day 1, pain score on VAS criteria on post-operative Day 7, and complications, all in the favor of TAPP except for operative time which was in the favor of OLR. TAPP was found to be superior to OLR in terms of duration of post-operative hospital stay, pain scores on VAS criteria on post-operative days 1 and 7, and complications, whereas OLR was found superior only in terms of operative time. For recurrence, there was no significant difference between the two groups.