Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
In vivo dosimetry of total body irradiation patients: A 10 year retrospective analysis
S Carminati1, S Trivellato2, C Ingraito1
1Medical Physics Specialization School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Abstract:
Myeloablative Total Body Irradiation (TBI) used in our Institution, as part of the conditioning scheme for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, is an extended-distance supine technique that has been implemented using a 15 MV LINAC beam, lead lung compensators, PMMA, and water bolus to improve homogeneity. This study reviews in-vivo dosimetry (IVD) over 10 years of treatments, assessing the technique's robustness, accuracy, and efficiency. A 2-lateral opposite fields plan was calculated from planning CT with validated Oncentra TPS (Elekta AB, Sweden). Monitor units (MUs), lung compensators shape and thickness were calculated to deliver the prescription dose (12 Gy in 6 bi-daily fractions or 9.9 Gy in 3 daily fractions) to the patient's abdomen midline at the umbilical level, maintaining lung dose within ±5 % range of prescription. Data from 103 patients, of which more than 87 % were pediatric, were retrieved and analyzed for a total of 537 treatment fractions. The impact of IVD omission was evaluated, supposing doing it only once or in the first two fractions, if necessary. Median ΔMU from planned was -1.2 %. Median percentage dose deviation from prescription in 6 anatomical regions was below 2 %. IVD omission could have resulted in an increase of 7 patients registering at least one anatomical region outside the ±5 % dose range at the end of treatment. It is possible to confirm the implemented technique's robustness and accuracy in delivering the prescribed dose under IVD monitoring. Nevertheless, this technique and associated IVD are time-consuming and IVD omission could be assessed with limited drawbacks.

