Clinical trials involving rare gynaecological cancers

Klejda Harasani1, Aleksandar Čelebić2, Irina Tripac3

  • 1Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine of Tirana, Tirana, Albania.

Insights

Few phase III clinical trials for rare gynecological cancers (RGC) complete and report results. Most trials fail to meet primary endpoints, underscoring the need for more RGC research and outcome reporting.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trial Research
  • Gynecologic Oncology

Background:

  • Clinical trials are crucial for developing new treatments for rare gynecological cancers (RGC).
  • Conducting trials for RGC faces unique challenges, impacting treatment advancement.
  • Evidence-based data is essential for effective and safe RGC therapies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review completed phase III clinical trials for rare gynecological cancers.
  • To summarize the outcomes and challenges of these RGC clinical trials.
  • To highlight the scarcity of reported results from RGC trials.

Main Methods:

  • A narrative review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Searched international clinical trial registries and PubMed/Medline for RGC phase III trials.
  • Included trials investigating therapies for RGC with at least one medication.

Main Results:

  • Out of 31 identified phase III trials, only 8 (25.8%) reported results.
  • Most completed trials were multi-center, randomized, and used progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) as primary outcomes.
  • The majority of reported trials did not meet their primary endpoints.

Conclusions:

  • There is a significant scarcity of completed and reported phase III clinical trials for rare gynecological cancers.
  • The low success rate in meeting primary endpoints emphasizes the need for improved trial design and execution.
  • Sustained efforts in designing, conducting, and reporting RGC trials are vital for advancing patient care.