Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

An Orthotopic Endometrial Cancer Model with Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy Made From In Vivo Propagated and Cultured VX2 Cells
Published on: September 12, 2019
Clinical trials involving rare gynaecological cancers
Klejda Harasani1, Aleksandar Čelebić2, Irina Tripac3
1Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine of Tirana, Tirana, Albania.
Abstract:
Clinical trials that investigate therapies for rare gynaecological cancers (RGC) are essential to provide evidence-based data towards new effective and safe treatments, however, they present unique challenges. The main objective of this narrative review is to summarize completed phase III clinical trials investigating therapies for RGC and to discuss the outcomes of these trials. PRISMA guidelines were used to report the steps of the review. We searched the WHO's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed/Medline for publications reporting results from clinical trials on RGC including at least one medication. From 31 identified phase III clinical trials, 13 were still ongoing, four were terminated and just eight (25.8 %) had posted results and/or publications. The latter completed trials were mostly multi-center and located in at least two continents, participants were mainly adults, and the recruitment period varied from about 2.5 to 10.5 years. Allocation was randomized with parallel assignment in 7 out of 8 trials, while only one trial had double masking. The most common primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS), followed by overall survival (OS). Patient-reported outcomes were secondary outcome measures in four completed trials, assessing quality of life by various questionnaires. Most of the trials did not meet their primary endpoints. By highlighting the scarcity of clinical trials on RGC, our findings further emphasize the need for designing, conducting and sustaining phase III clinical trials to investigate innovative therapies for these conditions and report meaningful outcome measures.
Insights
Few phase III clinical trials for rare gynecological cancers (RGC) complete and report results. Most trials fail to meet primary endpoints, underscoring the need for more RGC research and outcome reporting.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trial Research
- Gynecologic Oncology
Background:
- Clinical trials are crucial for developing new treatments for rare gynecological cancers (RGC).
- Conducting trials for RGC faces unique challenges, impacting treatment advancement.
- Evidence-based data is essential for effective and safe RGC therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review completed phase III clinical trials for rare gynecological cancers.
- To summarize the outcomes and challenges of these RGC clinical trials.
- To highlight the scarcity of reported results from RGC trials.
Main Methods:
- A narrative review following PRISMA guidelines.
- Searched international clinical trial registries and PubMed/Medline for RGC phase III trials.
- Included trials investigating therapies for RGC with at least one medication.
Main Results:
- Out of 31 identified phase III trials, only 8 (25.8%) reported results.
- Most completed trials were multi-center, randomized, and used progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) as primary outcomes.
- The majority of reported trials did not meet their primary endpoints.
Conclusions:
- There is a significant scarcity of completed and reported phase III clinical trials for rare gynecological cancers.
- The low success rate in meeting primary endpoints emphasizes the need for improved trial design and execution.
- Sustained efforts in designing, conducting, and reporting RGC trials are vital for advancing patient care.

