Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Evolving Role of Coronary Collaterals in STEMI Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Phases
Ozgur Ulas Ozcan1, Muhammed Bora Demircelik1, Aykun Hakgor1
1Department of Cardiology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Insights
During the COVID-19 pandemic, coronary collaterals were less protective for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Post-pandemic, robust collaterals significantly reduced mortality and major adverse cardiac events in STEMI care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management is crucial, with coronary collaterals offering protection against myocardial damage.
- The COVID-19 pandemic presented unprecedented challenges in STEMI care, potentially impacting treatment efficacy and patient outcomes.
- Understanding the role of coronary collaterals during and after the pandemic is vital for optimizing STEMI management strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the protective efficacy of coronary collaterals in STEMI patients during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the post-pandemic period.
- To analyze the impact of collateral status on in-hospital mortality and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in these two distinct timeframes.
- To investigate potential changes in collateral functionality and protective capacity influenced by the pandemic.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 1465 STEMI patients treated between April 2020 and December 2022 at a high-volume tertiary care center.
- Assessment of coronary collaterals using the established Rentrop classification system.
- Comparative analysis of in-hospital mortality and 1-year MACE rates stratified by collateral status and pandemic/post-pandemic periods.
Main Results:
- During the pandemic, a higher incidence of robust collaterals was observed (28.2% vs 23.2%), but they offered diminished protection, with similar mortality (14.4% vs 8.1%) and MACE rates (21.9% vs 30.4%) compared to the post-pandemic group.
- Post-pandemic, robust collaterals demonstrated significant protective effects, correlating with reduced in-hospital mortality (3.6% vs 7.4%) and 1-year MACE (17.1% vs 24.9%).
- These findings indicate a potential impairment in collateral functionality during the pandemic, affecting their protective capacity in STEMI.
Conclusions:
- Coronary collaterals play a dynamic role in STEMI management, with their protective efficacy potentially compromised during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- The pandemic era necessitated adaptive strategies in STEMI care due to observed changes in collateral function.
- Further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms behind pandemic-related alterations in collateral function and to develop resilient STEMI care protocols for future health crises.
Abstract:
Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition where coronary collaterals can mitigate myocardial damage. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic introduced unique challenges in STEMI management, potentially affecting outcomes. This study evaluates the efficacy of coronary collaterals during the pandemic compared to the post-pandemic period. A review of 1465 STEMI patients treated at a high-volume tertiary care center from April 2020 to December 2022 was conducted. Collaterals were assessed using the Rentrop classification. In-hospital mortality and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were analyzed based on collateral status and timeframes. During the pandemic, there was a higher incidence of robust collaterals (28.2% vs 23.2%, P = .04), but they were less protective, with similar in-hospital mortality (14.4% vs 8.1%, P = .07) and 1-year MACE rates (21.9% vs 30.4%, P = .09) across groups. Post-pandemic, robust collaterals showed significant protective effects with reduced in-hospital mortality (3.6% vs 7.4%, P = .04) and 1-year MACE rates (17.1% vs 24.9%, P = .03). These findings highlight a dynamic role of collaterals in STEMI management, with the pandemic impairing their functionality. This underscores the need for adaptive STEMI care strategies, especially during global health crises.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and clinical manifestations
Acute Coronary SyndromeI: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Surgical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic studies
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology