Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

17.6K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
17.6K
Compacting Factor test01:22

Compacting Factor test

119
The compacting factor test is a method used to assess the workability of concrete. It is  especially suitable for concrete mixes containing aggregates up to one and a half inches in size. This test involves specialized equipment consisting of two truncated cone-shaped hoppers and a cylinder, all with polished interior surfaces to minimize friction.
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...
119
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.5K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.5K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2.5K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Harmonizing standards and resources for the medical genome.

Nature·2026
Same author

Aardvark: sifting through differences in a mound of variants.

Genome biology·2026
Same author

A complete human pancreatic cancer genome.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Complete genomes of a multi-generational pedigree to expand studies of genetic and epigenetic inheritance.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Characterization of subclonal variants in HG002 Genome in a Bottle reference material as a resource for benchmarking variant callers.

Cell genomics·2025
Same author

A complete diploid human genome benchmark for personalized genomics.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.2K

Jointly benchmarking small and structural variant calls with vcfdist.

Tim Dunn1, Justin M Zook2, James M Holt3

  • 1Computer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. timdunn@umich.edu.

Genome Biology
|October 2, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

vcfdist is the first tool to jointly benchmark small and structural variants across the whole genome. This unified approach significantly reduces measured errors for SNPs, INDELs, and SVs, improving variant call accuracy.

Keywords:
BenchmarkingComparisonDeletionInsertionPhasingSingle-nucleotide polymorphismStructural variationVariant calling

More Related Videos

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing
11:11

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

16.7K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

923

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.2K
Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing
11:11

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

16.7K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

923

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Variant calling is crucial for genomic analysis, but current benchmarking tools often evaluate different variant types (SNPs, INDELs, SVs) separately.
  • Existing methods face challenges in accurately assessing phased variant calls, particularly concerning phasing errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce vcfdist, a novel variant call benchmarking tool capable of jointly evaluating single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions/deletions (INDELs), and structural variants (SVs) across the whole genome.
  • To demonstrate the benefits of a joint evaluation approach for improving the accuracy and interpretability of variant call benchmarking.

Main Methods:

  • Extension of the vcfdist tool to incorporate joint evaluation of SNPs, INDELs, and SVs.
  • Application of the enhanced vcfdist tool to three independent datasets for comprehensive benchmarking.
  • Analysis of phasing accuracy and error reduction through unified variant type evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Joint evaluation uniformly reduced measured errors across all variant types: SNPs by 28.9%, INDELs by 19.3%, and SVs by 52.4%.
  • vcfdist corrected a common flaw in phasing evaluations, reducing measured flip errors by over 50%.
  • The tool demonstrated superior accuracy compared to previous methods and comparable performance to state-of-the-art approaches, with enhanced result interpretability.

Conclusions:

  • Jointly benchmarking SNPs, INDELs, and SVs provides a more accurate and comprehensive assessment of variant call quality.
  • vcfdist offers a significant advancement in variant call benchmarking, addressing limitations in previous tools and improving phasing evaluation.
  • The enhanced interpretability of vcfdist results facilitates better understanding and utilization of genomic variant data.