Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025
Perspectives on Neuroscience
Published on: July 31, 2007
How to Peer Review a Neurology Education Manuscript
Daniel G Di Luca1, Steven M Lazar1, Preeta Gupta1
1From the Department of Neurology (D.G.D.L.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Section of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience (S.M.L.), Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Department of Neurology (P.G., Z.L.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Philippine General Hospital (M.C.S.L.), Manilla; Department of Neurology (C.C.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; Division of Neurology (D.V.F.A.), Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital/The Ohio State University, Columbus; and Department of Neurology (J.J.M., A.F., A.M.S.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Abstract:
Peer review is an essential process in scientific research, ensuring the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and suitability of manuscripts for publication. Neurology education research differs from biomedical clinical research in several ways. These differences encompass specific paradigms, the use of theoretical frameworks, and different methodological approaches. Despite the high number of studies and journal publications on neurology education, there is a dearth of resources and guidance on how to perform a formal review on this specific literature. This article aims to review the distinctive features of neurology education from clinical research while proposing an organizational framework and model for performing peer reviews of papers focused on neurology education.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Neurulation
01:25What is a Nervous System?
01:37Neural Regulation
01:43Proofreading
00:49The Blood-brain Barrier
01:31Neuron Structure