Education Research: Evaluating Medical Student Learning Preference and Its Relationship to Clerkship Satisfaction

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Association of American Medical Colleges' commitment to competency-based medical education (CBME) has shifted the medical education landscape. Education methods conducive to CBME are learner-centered and give educators the opportunity to develop a more personalized approach to curricular development and delivery. By understanding learning preferences, educators are better positioned to respond to the changing needs of students. The Learning Preference Inventory (LPI) is a validated tool that assesses preferences across 3 domains: (1) content delivery (concrete vs abstract), (2) instruction (teacher-centered vs student-centered), and (3) learning structure (individual vs interpersonal). Using the LPI, our objective was to describe the learning preferences of medical students in the Neurology clerkship and to evaluate how preferences correlate with satisfaction with curricular elements.

A cohort of second-year through fourth-year medical students rotating through the required Neurology clerkship at a single institution was identified. All students completed the LPI and a survey to assess satisfaction with curricular elements, including an in-person localization session, virtual simulation, and a summative case study.

Five hundred thirty medical students were included. Preference for concrete content delivery was much more common than abstract (83% vs 17%); otherwise students were evenly divided in their preferences for teacher-centered vs learner-centered instruction and interpersonal vs individual learning structure. There was a significant difference in LPI responses across medical school years: More third-year and fourth-year students preferred individual learning structure compared with second-year students (p = 0.040). Learning preferences also correlated with course satisfaction survey responses. Student satisfaction with the course activities was overall positive, with 69% of students agreeing that the course enhanced their learning. Abstract learners were significantly more likely to report that the virtual simulation enhanced their learning than concrete learners (p = 0.018).

Neurology clerkship students demonstrated clear learning preferences that were associated with satisfaction with specific curricular content. There were significant differences in learning preferences across medical school years, suggesting that learning preferences may shift throughout training and may be influenced by clinical exposure. In an educational environment that cultivates the success of all learners, the LPI provides important data to inform curricular development and achieve personalized medical education.