Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Anatomical Factors Affecting the Complexity of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation in Saudi Patients: A Cone Beam Computed
Salwa Aldahlawi1, Dalia Nourah1, Ehdaa Alturkistani2
1Department of Basic and Clinical Oral Science, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU.
Aim:
This study aims to evaluate the anatomical variations of the maxillary sinus and determine the difficulty score of maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) in Saudi patients seeking dental implant rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Methodology:
CBCT records of dental patients seeking treatment at a University Dental Teaching Hospital between 2019 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Measurements were obtained from CBCT images, including membrane thickness, sinus width, buccal bone thickness, presence of maxillary sinus septa, residual alveolar ridge height, angle of the buccolingual sinus wall, and the presence of the alveolar antral artery (AAA). The difficulty score for MSA was determined based on these anatomical factors.
Results:
A total of 107 maxillary sinuses in 86 subjects were evaluated. The average membrane thickness was 2.23 mm, with males showing significantly higher thickness than females. Sinus septa were found in 54 (50.5%) sinuses, with 18 (17%) of sinuses having interfering septa. Twenty-three (21.5%) sinuses had a residual alveolar ridge height of less than 4 mm. The average angle of the buccolingual sinus wall was 79.39°, indicating a high prevalence of wide-shaped sinuses. The average sinus width was 14.09 mm, with 55 sinuses (51.4%) less than 15 mm. The average buccal bone thickness was 1.07 mm, in 29 (27%) sinuses, the thickness was more than 2 mm. AAA was visualized in 60 (56%) of sinuses, with 45 (42%) of sinuses having AAA interfering with the MSA window.
Conclusions:
In this study, most sinuses were classified as simple or moderate difficulty, with higher membrane thickness, presence of septa, and AAA being the significant risk factors for complications. These findings provide valuable insights for implant surgeons in Saudi patients seeking dental implant rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla, enabling them to anticipate and minimize potential complications during MSA procedures.
