Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Impact of Intracardiac Neurons on Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmogenesis in an Ex Vivo Langendorff System
Published on: May 22, 2018
Assessing post-TAVR cardiac conduction abnormalities risk using an electromechanically coupled beating heart
Symon Reza1, Brandon Kovarovic1, Danny Bluestein2
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8084, USA.
Insights
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can cause cardiac conduction abnormalities (CCA) due to device pressure on heart fibers. Deeper implantation and right bundle branch block increase CCA risk, while aortic deployment and left bundle branch block may reduce it.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular medicine
- Biomedical engineering
- Computational modeling
Background:
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly preferred over surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
- Cardiac conduction abnormalities (CCA) are a significant complication following TAVR.
- Pressure from the TAVR device on cardiac conduction fibers near the atrioventricular node can cause CCA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an in silico framework for assessing CCA risk after TAVR.
- To investigate the impact of implantation depth and pre-existing cardiac asynchrony on CCA.
- To analyze biomechanical parameters influencing post-TAVR CCA.
Main Methods:
- Simulated self-expandable TAVR device deployment in an electromechanically coupled beating heart model.
- Modeled five patient scenarios with varying implantation depths and pre-existing conditions (RBBB, LBBB).
- Analyzed cumulative contact pressure on conduction fibers.
Main Results:
- Aortic TAVR deployment resulted in lower contact pressure (0.018 MPa) compared to ventricular deployment (0.52 MPa).
- Pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) showed higher contact pressure (0.34 MPa) than left bundle branch block (LBBB) (0.25 MPa).
- Deeper implantation and RBBB increased stress and contact pressure on conduction fibers.
Conclusions:
- Deeper TAVR implantation and RBBB elevate the risk of post-TAVR CCA.
- Aortic deployment and LBBB may reduce the risk of CCA.
- In silico modeling provides a valuable tool for predicting and mitigating TAVR-related conduction complications.
Abstract:
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has rapidly displaced surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, certain post-TAVR complications persist, with cardiac conduction abnormalities (CCA) being one of the major ones. The elevated pressure exerted by the TAVR stent onto the conduction fibers situated between the aortic annulus and the His bundle, in proximity to the atrioventricular (AV) node, may disrupt the cardiac conduction leading to the emergence of CCA. In this study, an in silico framework was developed to assess the CCA risk, incorporating the effect of a dynamic beating heart and preprocedural parameters such as implantation depth and preexisting cardiac asynchrony in the new onset of post-TAVR CCA. A self-expandable TAVR device deployment was simulated inside an electromechanically coupled beating heart model in five patient scenarios, including three implantation depths and two preexisting cardiac asynchronies: (i) a right bundle branch block (RBBB) and (ii) a left bundle branch block (LBBB). Subsequently, several biomechanical parameters were analyzed to assess the post-TAVR CCA risk. The results manifested a lower cumulative contact pressure on the conduction fibers following TAVR for aortic deployment (0.018 MPa) compared to nominal condition (0.29 MPa) and ventricular deployment (0.52 MPa). Notably, the preexisting RBBB demonstrated a higher cumulative contact pressure (0.34 MPa) compared to the nominal condition and preexisting LBBB (0.25 MPa). Deeper implantation and preexisting RBBB cause higher stresses and contact pressure on the conduction fibers leading to an increased risk of post-TAVR CCA. Conversely, implantation above the MS landmark and preexisting LBBB reduces the risk.
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm
Electrocardiogram
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and the T...
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias

