Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Mate Choice

Mate Choice

Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.

What is Natural Selection?

What is Natural Selection?

Natural selection is an evolutionary process in which individuals with survival-promoting traits reproduce at higher rates. These favorable traits become more common within a population or species. Naturally selected traits initially arise via random genetic mutations. In order for selection to occur, there must be variation within a population, the trait controlling the variation must be heritable, and there must be an evolutionary advantage for variation in the trait.The Theory of Natural...

Types of Selection

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Unheard voices: the overlooked mental health toll of climate change in vulnerable communities.

BMJ mental health·2026

Same author

Visual perception of longitudinal waves: theory and observations.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Is there more to adaptation than meets the eye?

Vision research·2026

Same author

The Impact of Induced Optical Blur on Monocular and Binocular Depth-Related Visuomotor Task Performance.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2025

Same author

A visual search asymmetry for plaids.

Perception·2025

Same author

Depth-Related Visuomotor Performance in Keratoconus and Its Relationship to Stereopsis.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2025

Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026

Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026

Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026

Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026

Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026

Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Individual differences in direction-selective motion adaptation revealed by change-detection performance.

Kristina Zeljic¹, Joshua A Solomon¹, Michael J Morgan¹

¹City St George's, University of London, United Kingdom.

Vision Research

|October 3, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Individual differences in motion adaptation exist, with some people showing weaker effects. This suggests genuine variations in how the brain processes visual motion and orientation changes.

Keywords:

Change Detection Individual Differences Motion Adaptation Psychophysics Visual Search

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Perceptual Psychology
Vision Science

Background:

Motion aftereffect (MAE) and motion adaptation are typically viewed as universal perceptual phenomena.
Preliminary findings suggest potential individual variability in adaptation strength, possibly bimodal distribution within the population.
Previous research indicated poor performance in change detection tasks among individuals with weak MAE.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the hypothesis of population bimodality in motion adaptation.
To identify and characterize individuals with distinct abilities in motion adaptation using change detection tasks.
To explore confounding factors such as eye movements, practice effects, and visual search deficits.

Main Methods:

Screening 102 participants using two versions of a motion change-detection task.
Selecting the strongest and weakest performers for further analysis.
Assessing motion detection and contrast detection thresholds post-adaptation to drifting gratings.
Analyzing eye movements and controlling for practice effects.

Main Results:

An inverse relationship was found between change-detection ability and motion-detection performance.
Weakest change detectors showed reduced direction selectivity in contrast thresholds after adaptation.
Correlation observed between detecting changes in motion direction and spatial orientation.
Differences between strong and weak detectors were not explained by practice or fixation ability.

Conclusions:

Genuine individual differences exist in the specificity of visual adaptation to stimulus orientation and motion direction.
The findings challenge the notion of universal motion adaptation, highlighting population heterogeneity.
Individual variations in adaptation may relate to differences in sensory processing and perceptual learning.