Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

High Throughput Sequential ELISA for Validation of Biomarkers of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Published on: October 31, 2012
Comparison of etonogestrel bioanalytical assay results in plasma and serum within and across laboratories
Shawnalyn W Sunagawa1, Lee C Winchester1, Christopher S Wichman2
1Antiviral Pharmacology Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Objectives:
To compare performance characteristics of etonogestrel bioanalytical assays across laboratories.
Study Design:
We conducted a blinded, six laboratory study: five academic laboratories and one contracted commercial laboratory (reference). Etonogestrel was quantitated at each laboratory in both prepared serum and/or plasma samples of six known etonogestrel concentrations, and in 60 clinical samples from participants using etonogestrel-containing contraceptive methods. Per regulatory guidance, laboratory accuracy (percent bias) and precision (coefficient of variation; CV) were defined as ±15% of the nominal prepared concentration. We compared inter- and intra-laboratory agreement using a Kendall's Tau-B and Passing-Bablok regression.
Results:
For prepared samples, six laboratories analyzed serum and three laboratories analyzed plasma. All etonogestrel results were within ±15% for accuracy across all concentrations at four labs, including the reference laboratory. All labs demonstrated high precision, with only one occurrence of CV >15%. We found a positive association between prepared plasma and serum etonogestrel results (Kendall's Tau-B 0.80-0.88). For clinical samples, five laboratories analyzed serum and three laboratories analyzed plasma. Compared to the reference laboratory, inter-laboratory serum etonogestrel concentrations were positively correlated (Kendall's Tau-B 0.76-0.95). Proportional bias was observed, meaning individual lab etonogestrel results were consistently higher (slope estimates 0.78-0.95) or lower (slope estimates 1.05-1.10) than the reference laboratory. In clinical samples, intra-laboratory results were well associated between plasma and serum (Kendall's Tau-B 0.92-0.96).
Conclusions:
There was good intra-laboratory agreement, irrespective of sample matrix; however, there was inter-laboratory variability in etonogestrel results. Differences between laboratory results should be considered when comparing etonogestrel pharmacokinetics across studies.
Implications:
Etonogestrel concentrations were highly precise within each laboratory and were comparable between serum and plasma. Results varied between laboratories (5-28% higher to 5-9% lower compared to the Organon commercial laboratory). To minimize variability, we recommend utilizing a single laboratory that conducts routine proficiency testing for etonogestrel analysis within a study.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence: Overview
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacokinetic Methods
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Equivalence: In Vitro and In Vivo Bioequivalence
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

