Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
Effects of loading processes on contact forces when simulating static seating with a finite element human body model
Shenghui Liu1,2, Philippe Beillas2, Li Ding1
1Key Laboratory of Biomechanics and Mechanobiology, Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
A new simulation method, drop and rotate (D&R), better mimics how people sit, improving predictions of seat interface forces and pressure ulcer risk. This method is less sensitive to friction than the standard gravity drop (DROP) method.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Human Body Modeling
Background:
- Seat interface forces, especially shear forces, are critical for predicting pressure ulcers and seating discomfort.
- Current static seating simulations using finite element human body models (HBMs) often employ a gravity drop (DROP) method, which inaccurately represents the natural sitting process.
- High coefficients of friction (COF) are frequently used in simulations, potentially leading to unrealistic tangential forces.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of different loading processes and COF on seating simulations using HBMs.
- To introduce and evaluate a novel 'drop and rotate' (D&R) loading method designed to more accurately simulate how individuals sit.
- To compare the D&R method against the conventional DROP method in terms of force prediction and sensitivity to COF.
Main Methods:
- Development and application of a 'drop and rotate' (D&R) loading technique for HBM static seating simulations.
- The D&R method involves initial trunk flexion followed by hip rotation to establish contact, mimicking natural sitting.
- Simulations were conducted on a validated adult male HBM across two distinct seat configurations.
Main Results:
- The D&R method demonstrated reduced sensitivity to COF compared to the DROP method.
- The D&R approach yielded more accurate predictions of contact forces, particularly on the seat pan.
- While more computationally intensive, the D&R method offers improved simulation fidelity.
Conclusions:
- The loading process significantly influences the outcomes of static seating simulations.
- The proposed D&R method provides a more realistic simulation of seating biomechanics and improves the prediction of interface forces.
- Future research should consider the D&R method for more accurate HBM seating analyses to mitigate risks like pressure ulcers.
Related Concept Videos
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
Impact Loading
In cases of elastic deformation,...
Residual Stresses in Bending
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry
Internal Loadings in Structural Members: Problem Solving
To illustrate this, let's consider a beam OC of 5 kN, inclined at an angle of 53.13° with the horizontal and supported at both ends. Determine the internal...
Normal and Tangetial Components: Problem Solving

