Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Influencing factors and predictive model for left atrial appendage emptying velocity in nonvalvular AF patients
Weibin He1, Lei Yin1, Qian Liu1
1Department of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Insights
Reduced left atrial appendage emptying velocity (LAAEV) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is predicted by age, heart failure, AF type, left atrial diameter, and left ventricular ejection fraction. This model aids in assessing and managing nonvalvular AF.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Diagnostics
- Predictive Modeling
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent arrhythmia increasing stroke risk.
- The left atrial appendage (LAA) is key in AF development.
- Reduced LAA emptying velocity (LAAEV) indicates thrombosis risk and post-ablation recurrence in nonvalvular AF.
Purpose of the Study:
- Identify factors influencing LAAEV in nonvalvular AF patients.
- Develop a predictive model for LAAEV.
- Improve assessment and management strategies for nonvalvular AF.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 1,048 nonvalvular AF patients.
- Utilized transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
- Employed logistic and multiple linear regression for predictor identification and model construction.
Main Results:
- 43.61% of patients had reduced LAAEV (<40 cm/s).
- Independent predictors of reduced LAAEV identified: age, heart failure (HF), AF type (Persistent/Long-standing Persistent vs. Paroxysmal AF), left atrial diameter (LAD), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
- The predictive model explained 43.5% of LAAEV variance.
Conclusions:
- Age, HF, AF type, LAD, and LVEF are significant predictors of reduced LAAEV.
- A validated predictive model for LAAEV was established.
- The model can assist in the initial evaluation and treatment planning for nonvalvular AF patients.
Background:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, significantly increasing the risk of death and stroke. The left atrial appendage (LAA) plays a crucial role in the development of AF. Reduced left atrial appendage emptying velocity (LAAEV) is an important indicator of nonvalvular AF, associated with thrombosis and recurrence after catheter ablation. This study aims to identify factors influencing LAAEV and construct a predictive model for LAAEV in nonvalvular AF patients.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study included 1,048 nonvalvular AF patients hospitalized at the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021. Patients underwent transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and had complete laboratory data. Statistical analyses included binary logistic regression and multiple linear regression to identify independent predictors of reduced LAAEV and construct a predictive model.
Results:
Patients were divided into two groups: reduced LAAEV (<40 cm/s) and normal LAAEV (≥40 cm/s). The reduced LAAEV group included 457 patients (43.61%), with significant differences in age, gender, alcohol consumption, heart failure (HF), ischemic stroke, AF type, resting heart rate, CHA2DS2-VASc score, serum creatinine (SCR), serum uric acid (SUA), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), β2 macroglobulin (B2M), left atrial diameter (LAD), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared to the normal LAAEV group. Logistic regression analysis identified age (OR 0.974, 95% CI 0.951-0.997, P = 0.028), HF (OR 0.637, 95% CI 0.427-0.949, P = 0.027), AF type [Persistent AF vs. PAF (OR 0.063, 95% CI 0.041-0.095, P = 0) Long-standing Persistent AF vs. PAF (OR 0.077, 95% CI 0.043-0.139, P = 0)], LAD (OR 0.872, 95% CI 0.836-0.91, P < 0.001), and LVEF (OR 1.057, 95% CI 1.027-1.089, P = 0) as independent predictors of reduced LAAEV. Multiple linear regression analysis included age, AF type, LAD, and LVEF in the final predictive model, explaining 43.5% of the variance in LAAEV (adjusted R² = 0.435).
Conclusion:
Age, HF, type of AF, LAD, and LVEF are independent predictors of reduced LAAEV. The predictive model (LAAEV = 96.567-15.940 × AFtype-1.309 × LAD-0.18 × Age + 37.069 × LVEF) demonstrates good predictive value, aiding in the initial assessment and management of nonvalvular AF patients.
More Related Videos
28:13Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022