Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Blind Procedures

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Blinding

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same journal

Long-term eradication of the chytrid fungus <i>Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis</i> from a large <i>Xenopus laevis</i> husbandry.

Laboratory animals·2026

Same journal

Reporting and transparency in laboratory animal science: Past achievements, present concerns and future directions.

Laboratory animals·2026

Same journal

Complete Freund's adjuvant in laboratory animals: Reported welfare-relevant outcomes and alternatives-a scoping review.

Laboratory animals·2026

Same journal

Can trained behavior serve as tool for welfare assessment? A pilot study in a cancer model with Wistar rats.

Laboratory animals·2026

Same journal

Standardized surgical access to the porcine temporomandibular joint: Anatomical basis for translational research.

Laboratory animals·2026

Same journal

Development of animal use in experiments: a brief historical overview.

Laboratory animals·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

A Method for Remotely Silencing Neural Activity in Rodents During Discrete Phases of Learning

A Method for Remotely Silencing Neural Activity in Rodents During Discrete Phases of Learning

Published on: June 22, 2015

Methods for applying blinding and randomisation in animal experiments.

P S Verhave¹, R van Eenige^2,3, Iacw Tiebosch⁴

¹Animal Welfare Body Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center and Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Laboratory Animals

|October 4, 2024

Summary

Implementing blinding and randomisation in pre-clinical studies minimizes bias. This review details methods for randomisation and blinding, focusing on practical application in animal research to enhance study robustness.

Keywords:

Bias blinding experimental design randomisation robust design techniques

More Related Videos

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

A Method for Remotely Silencing Neural Activity in Rodents During Discrete Phases of Learning

A Method for Remotely Silencing Neural Activity in Rodents During Discrete Phases of Learning

Published on: June 22, 2015

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

Area of Science:

Pre-clinical research methodology
Experimental design in life sciences
Animal study protocols

Background:

Incomplete or improper blinding and randomisation are recognized sources of bias in pre-clinical studies.
Bias can lead to false positive or negative results, compromising study validity.
Robust experimental design is crucial for reliable scientific evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

To outline methods for implementing randomisation and blinding in pre-clinical studies.
To provide practical tips for the effective application of these bias-reduction techniques.
To focus on the specific challenges and solutions for randomisation and blinding in animal studies.

Main Methods:

Review of established randomisation techniques, from simple to software-based strategies.
Discussion of blinding protocols, emphasizing the need for strong procedures and teamwork.
Practical guidance on integrating randomisation and blinding into the workflow of animal studies.

Main Results:

Randomisation ensures even distribution of covariates, diminishing group differences that cause bias.
Blinding prevents unintentional researcher influence during data collection and analysis.
Effective implementation of both methods significantly enhances the reliability of pre-clinical findings.

Conclusions:

Randomisation and blinding are essential for robust pre-clinical research, particularly in animal studies.
Adherence to rigorous protocols and practical implementation strategies is key to minimizing bias.
This review serves as a guide for researchers aiming to improve the quality and reproducibility of their studies.